WAQF (Amendment) Bill did not pass the Rajya Sabha by 2025
The Waqf Amendment Bill has been passed in the Rajya Sabha. 128 members voted in favor of the bill and 95 MPs voted against it. During the discussion on the bill, a lot of verbal arrows went. Both sides had their respective things. The ruling party calculated the benefits of the bill, while describing the opposition Waqf amendment bill as anti -constitution.
Waqf Amendment Bill passed in Rajya Sabha
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday after the Lok Sabha passed. The Waqf (Amendment) Bill was passed in 2025 in the House. 128 votes were cast in favor of the bill, with 95 votes against the bill.
Union Minority Affairs Minister Green Rijiju presented a bill in the Rajya Sabha, thereby saying that there was no question of intervention in religious matters. During the discussion after the introduction of the bill, the leaders of the ruling party accused the Muslims of misleading the country’s Muslims. On the other hand, the leaders of the opposition described it against the constitution.
Green Rijiju introduced the Waqf amendment bill in the Rajya Sabha
Union Minority Affairs Minister Green Rijiju, who presented the bill in the Rajya Sabha, said, “One crore recommendations have been received in favor of the Waqf Amendment Bill. The Joint Parliamentary Committee went to 10 cities.
During the discussion on the Waqf Amendment Bill, JP What did the tape say?
Union Health Minister J.P. Said Nada. With this house, I would like to tell the people of the country that the government headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi is fully progressing by following the democratic rules. There is a need to determine the proper maintenance and accountability of the Waqf properties. He raised the question of who had been afraid of the Muslim community for 70 years. He said the Congress had adopted this policy for decades, but now people have seen the decision.
Cargin’s claim- is done for political gains
Opposition Leader Mallikarjun Cork said the Waqf bill was not a common law. This law is transformed into weapons for political gains. It is used by the Modi government to systematically weaken the country’s diversity. When the bill was passed in the late Lok Sabha, 288 votes were cast in favor and 232 votes in the Opposition. From this, we can guess that the bill was spontaneously brought in, even after the opposition of various parties. The BJP government talks much about the welfare of the minority. Authorization is done. But the truth is clear from the budget allocation of the government’s five -year minority sector. The budget allocation of this sector in the financial year 2019-20 was Rs 4,700 crore, which was Rs 2,608 crore in 2023-24. Budget allocation was Rs 2,612 crore in the financial year 2022-23, of which the ministry could not spend Rs 1,775 crore. In total, the budget was received in five years, which could not spend Rs 18,274 crore, of which 3,574 crore.
What did Sudhanshu Triveti say during the discussion on the bill?
The BJP’s Rajya Sabha MP said that the work has been actively done in the preparation of the bill. Sudhashu Trivedi said, but some are spreading false understanding of its rules. Trivedi tightened and said, “The fresh mullah eats more onions, but here the old Mullah eats more items.” He questioned why the Sunni Waqf Board and the Shia Waqf Board differ in the country. Not only that, but the Waqf Board stopped the claim of the Taj Mahal. He said the government has fully assured the welfare of the Muslim community. He said, “This rivalry is only for those who believe in the development of society and to serve their interests. Our government is with the poor Muslim community, not with the politics of the radical vote bank.
Kapil Sibal said- who can stop me, no one
Independent Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal said he could donate his property; There is no one to prevent them. Suppose I have a Hindu, a Muslim, a Sikh or a Christian, and I have some assets I want to donate, and then can stop me, no one can stop. It was said that the rules made in 1954 and 1995, only Muslims could make Walkf (donation). No other person can donate his property to the Waqf board here. The amendment brought in 2013 ended the ban. Now it is said that only Muslims can give Waqf in this new amendment bill. He mentioned such court decisions, where the Hindus donated their land to various projects such as the graves.
What did Abhishek Manu Singhvi say during the discussion on the bill?
Congress MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi said, ‘What an autonomy left in this bill? There is only government control. In the old law, the CEO of the Waqf Board had to be a Muslim. Also, it is necessary to hire one of two people. These rules are not included in the current bill. He said that he would like to ask anyone else than anyone else, while referring to the Charity Endowment Act of Karnataka Hindu Institute, Mata Vaishno Devi Temple Act, Sikh Guruvara Act and Uttar Pradesh Kashi Viswanath Temple Act. Newly -developed friends and Telugu Desam Party leader Chandrababu Naidu have also said that a non -Hindu people can come to the Tirupati Board. Bhaktan ‘
Manoj Ja raised questions about the government’s purpose regarding the bill
Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MP Manoj Ja said some things are found under an old mosque. In such an environment, it is natural for the government to raise the Waqf amendment bill. Look at how the country’s atmosphere is. The economic boycott was once spoken, and the place of worship was questioned. In such an environment, both the draft and objectives of your bill are questioned. Sometimes the bill seems to be a legal card for bulldozers.
Syed Nasir Hussein said- Anyone can donate to anyone
Congress Rajya Sabha MP Syed Nasir Hussein said that Waqf Maina is Dharma. Anyone can donate to anyone. He said that the concept of Dharma is not only in our religion but in every religion. A Waqf Board has been created to oversee the Idars made for the purpose of our donations. The fact that a Waqf Board has been created to satisfy Muslims is spreading on social media. They do not know that there is an endowment board in this country, not to say, in this country there is a Hindu Place Act, in this country there is an SGBC in this country, the temple is a trust, a company and a company for Christianity. Separate actions have been enacted to regulate the matters of each religion.
Green Rijiju responded after discussing the Waqf amendment bill
In the Rajya Sabha, Union Minister Green Rijiju said, “Why should the Waqf Board be a legal organization and only Muslims should be included in the legal system? If there is any controversy between Hindus and Muslims, how will the controversy be resolved? … There may be controversies with non -Muslims on the Waqf board … The legal system must be secular and all religions must be represented. Bhaktan ‘
Country and the world’s latest news (There is no message) Read more in Hindi, all the big messages Times now Navbarath Live TV But. Nation (India news) Updates and elections (Elections) The Times is now related to the latest news.
