The Lok Sabha approved the Waqf Amendment Bill at 2 pm; How many votes were cast in the side and opposition? Get to know everything

Waqf (revision) bill passed Lok Sabha: After the launch of the Lok Sabha on August 8 last year, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill was sent to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on August 8, 2024.

Waqf amendment bill passed in the Lok Sabha

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill has been passed in the Lok Sabha. The bill was voted in the Lok Sabha late at night. When the results of the vote were revealed, 288 votes were cast in favor of the bill and 232 votes against the bill.

Bill was introduced in Parliament after Cabinet approval

At the meeting, the Trade Union Cabinet Joint Committee (JPC) approved 14 amendments proposed. BJP MP The report of the JPC, led by Jagdambika Paul, was presented on February 13 in the midst of the Opposition parties and walking. After the approval of the trade union cabinet, the bill is now expected to be issued in Parliament during the second part of the budget session. The second phase of the budget session was proposed from March 10 to April 4.

Many best BJP leaders have said that the bill is likely to be passed during the session. This 655 -page report of the JBC contains the recommendations made by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) members. Opposition members have refused to do so, and accused the action of destroying Waqf boards. The BJP members insisted that the bill introduced in the Lok Sabha in August last year would try to bring about modernity, transparency and accountability in managing Waqf assets.

Bill was sent to Jabis on August 8, 2024

The committee accepted all amendments proposed by BJP members and rejected the amendments of the opposition members. The Waqf (Amendment) Bill was sent to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on August 8, 2024, 2024, and the Minister of Minority Affairs, Green Rijiju, was introduced in the Lok Sabha. The bill is aimed at the amendment of the Waqf law in 1995 to solve the issues and challenges of regulating and managing Waqf assets.

What did the government say when rejecting the claims of the opposition parties?

If he did not bring the Waqf amendment bill, the government said that many buildings, including the Parliament House, would have visited the Delhi Waqf Board, and that during the Congress regime, the Waqf assets were properly managed, and that the fate of the country would have changed. When the Waqf (Amendment) Bill was held in the Lok Sabha in 2025, Union Minority Affairs Minister Green Rijiju said that the government and the Waqf Board would not interfere in any religious institution, including the mosque.

He rejected the opposition’s claims against the Waqf Amendment Bill, and when a comprehensive law was enacted in 1995, no one claimed that it was unconstitutional and illegal.

Opposition parties accused of misleading people

Rijiju said, ‘If we upgrade it today, it is unconstitutional. Talk about arguments. There are no contacts with the bill and efforts are made to mislead people. Some say that the government will carry the assets of mosques, dargahs and Muslims, which is a completely wrong thing. Rijiju made it clear that the bill would not match the pioneer.

Due to the need for the bill, he calculated that before the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, the then UPA government had taken some steps, from which several assets would have gone to the Delhi Waqf Board. For the first time in 2013, Rijiju said that a person from any religion in this country could make a Waqf. In addition to this, Shia Waqf is in the city of Shia, Sunni Sunni Waqf and no one else can come from outside and that such rules have been made.

‘If the government does not come, you don’t know how many buildings will go Waqf’

The Minister of Minority Affairs said, “In a section of the Waqf Board’s law, it is also written that there will be any existing law. How can you accept such a law in this country? He said the Delhi Waqf Board had demanded many assets, including the CGO complex in Delhi and this parliamentary house. On March 5, 2014, the then UPA government replaced 123 major assets to the Delhi Waqf Board under the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development on 5 March 2014.

Rijiju attacked the Congress and said, ‘Wait for a few days. You felt that you would get votes, but you lost the election. There is no votes available for such a job. The people of the country are smart. Rijiju said, “If we do not come with these amendments today, this parliamentary residence has been claimed. If the NDA government did not head the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, how many buildings would have gone to Waqf. He said that in the world, there is a large number of Waqf wealth in India and why they have not worked for many years for the advancement of poor Muslims, despite such assets. Rijiju said, ‘What objection is done if the prime minister is under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi. If Waqf assets were properly managed in the country, the fate of both the Muslim community and the country would have changed.

In 2006, 4.9 lakh Waqf assets were in the country, from which the total income was only Rs. Rijiju said, ‘The country can never accept it. Waqf’s attributes cannot be allowed to be wasted. It should be used for poor and common Muslims. Today there are a total of 8.72 lakh Waqf assets in the country, he said.

In this bill, there is an important rule that Waqf can only be done by protecting the rights of women and children, while the land of the tribal cannot be turned into Waqf property. The most oppressive stream of this law is a provision for the declaration of any property as a Waqf property, which some have used for their benefit, not for the poor. Rijiju said there are some contradictions in the law that the bill introduced.

According to Rijiju, the bill has an arrangement for Muttavalli, its administration and monitoring it. Rijiju said, “Waqf board will not manage Waqf property in any way. He said, ‘The government and the Waqf Board will never interfere in any religious activities. The bill does not have the arrangement for intervention in managing the mosque. He told the opposition members, ‘This is a matter of property administration in a normal way. We hear about the religious sentiments of Muslims. If you do not understand this fundamental difference, or do not want to understand, I have no treatment for it.

Referring to the results of the Kerala High Court and Allahabad High Court, Rijiju said that the Waqf Board was a legal unit and its responsibility for Muttavalli was secular and not religious. The Minister said in the Supreme Court ruling that managing the temple’s property was completely secular and not religious. He said, “Therefore, repeatedly say how non -Muslims come in favor of Muslims … This argument will not happen. Stop talking about this. “Waqf said that he had calculated some proposed rules of the Waqf Amendment Bill and said that Waqf could do what was ‘practiced’ of Islam for at least five years. He said the Waqf Board was secular and that they would be representatives of all Shia, Sunni and Bohra. There will be disadvantaged Muslims, women and non -Muslim experts, he said. He emphasized the opposition to support the bill, ‘The country will remember for centuries that supported the bill and who did not do so. For 70 years, you (the opposition) have misled Muslims to the vote bank and how long will you do so.

After implementing the law, Rijiju said that there would be a new morning’s confidence in the minds of everyone and that the new law was named ‘Hope’. He said many Muslim organizations and Christian organizations across the country support the bill. In the bill, the government does not take any rights of the states, but all the rights are granted to the states, Rijiju said. The biggest conclusion of the change in the Waqf definition is that Muslims prefer to run their Waqf property board, and then they are welcome, and if they want to act separately through the trust, they have a discount. Rijiju said that he tried to mislead the country on the Citizenship Amendment Act, targeting the Congress and other opposition parties.

He said, ‘Are the rights of Muslims being taken away after the CAA is implemented? You are spreading falsehood in the country. Will you apologize for this? If you mislead the public again, you will eat your mouth. Referring to the joint committee related to the bill, Rijiju said that the bill is the most widespread discussion and suggestions in the history of India’s parliamentary history.

Congress of Congress

Earlier, the Congress of the Congress.

Congress MP in Lok Sabha says the government is looking after the land of a particular community. Ka Aura Rav Gogoi accused Wednesday. He said that if the current Waqf law was amended, cases would increase in the country.

These NTA parties support the Waqf Amendment Bill

BJP’s friendship J.T. Many opposition parties, including the Congress and the Samajwadi Party, opposed it.

What did Amit Shah say during the discussion on the Waqf Bill?

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday accused Amit Shah of threatening not to adopt a proposed law on the Opposition Waqf in the Lok Sabha, but it would be a law passed by Parliament and accepted. He said that fear of Walk Bank politics is spreading, and the Waqf bill interferes with the religious matters of Muslims and the assets they donated by them.

Shah, who intervened in the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the 2025 House, made it clear that he would not be implemented with the previous impact after taking the form of its law, while the Muslim brothers are intimidated by this excuse. Within four years of taking the form of the bill, the Muslim brothers will know that these laws are for their good, Shah said. Digging the TMK members, he said that he was irritating all the churches in the respective constituencies by opposing the bill.

Country and the world’s latest news (There is no message) Read more in Hindi, all the big messages Times now Navbarath Live TV But. Nation (India news) Updates and elections (Elections) The Times is now related to the latest news.