The Failure of the European Commission in the case was welcomed by the “success of transparency”

Advertisement

NGOs and other organizations affected by transparency welcomed the decision of the European Union on Wednesday, accordingly, the European Commission did not submit a credible explanation that the European Commission had entered with the Faiser, which would not contain a credible explanation that the European Commission had entered with the contracts.

Following the manifestations of the New York Times, the publication of the publication of the publication of the news was about the presence of text messages between Ursula Van Ter Lain and Faiser’s Managing Director Albert Borla.

At the time, the Commission denied the request, arguing that the SMS did not complete the criteria in the short -term, short -term and company’s document management system.

“Today’s decision is a success in transparency and responsibility in the EU. This sends a powerful message, which does not come to public study,” the New York Times spokesman said in a statement after the decision.

The publication further stated that the trustees must handle the SMS as any other records and acknowledged that the European Commission has been badly addressed.

According to the court, the Commission simply cannot say that there are no demanded documents; It should provide reliable explanations that allow the public and the court to understand why the documents cannot be found.

They are not the only ones to compete in the commission

“Today’s judgment demonstrates that the EU should not use transparency and democratic responsibility in the closed gate in the EU,” said Mio Mats (Luxembourg/Green).

“When important decisions and contracts are confidential, there is a risk that business interests are more than general benefit,” he said.

Mats also involved in another court case launched in 2021 against Van Ter Lean on the transparency of vaccination agreements.

In this case, the Commission issued a severely written documents, and later condemned the administration’s decision to publish only versions of censored contracts.

In 2022, the European Ombudsman criticized the European Commission’s request for the New York Times, which described it as a “call for the responsibility of the EU”, and confirmed that it was an wrong administration in this regard.

Reacting to today’s verdict, the court provider said: “The court, such as the Judicial Provider, reiterated that the right to access the documents, reiterated the need for as much as possible, and always maintained the documents relating to their activities.”

He said that if companies do not register and retain these documents, the right to access the documents loses their meaning. He appealed to the Provider Commission to make the necessary decisions of today’s decision and ensure that the public is fully respected for public access documents.

“This verdict recalls that the European Union is managing by a law and its leaders continue to study the free media and an independent court,” said Alberto Alemano, founder of The Good Lafi.

NYT’s victory is “a victory for all, because this test can lead to greater accountability of the actions of EU leaders,” he added.

Advertisement

Shari Hinds, who are politically responsible to the International European Union to the Eurneus, said, “There is still a lot of uncertainty and what happened around what happened.”

Hinds also claimed that transparency and responsibility are essential when it comes to public health decisions, such as these agreements that affect millions of people.

“We think we need to restore public confidence. There are open problems. It is time to show its commitment to increase public responsibility,” he added.

The European Commission has said that it will closely review the court’s decision before deciding on the next steps to apply. There are two months to file an appeal to the commission and have announced the aim of accepting a new decision that will provide a detailed explanation in response to the New York Times.

Advertisement

The Commission said, “Transparency is always of great importance to the Commission and President Van Ter Leyan. We continue to respect the solid legal structure that is practiced to fulfill our duties.”