Should illegal migrants be deported to centers outside the EU?
Europe is aimed at reducing irregular migration and accelerating the process of refunding of asylum request. Taking this into account, the European Commission proposed a common European return system. Currently, repayment rates are around 20 percent, which is thought to be not enough for the President of the European Commission Ursula Van Ter Layan.
The program includes the possibility of creating centers that return in third countries based on bilateral or European agreements. However, the use of such contracts and legal reliability is complicated. The Italy-Albania protocol is an example of this.
In 2023, Rome and Tirana signed a contract to create Centers Initially, the so -called “safe countries” and is designed to welcome applicants to the SO -SO -SO -asylum rescued in international water. Italian courts have prevented the case three times due to legal and constitutional issues. Rome decided to include new functions at these centers, which have already begun to use asylum as a refund center to rejected persons. Rather 100 human rights systems They warned that the externalization of migration policies throughout Europe could cause anxiety form of human rights violations.
Externalization of Italy and asylum practices: Motasin’s case
About thirty kilometers north of Naples, there is a small municipality of Parate, which is located in a region known by agriculture and migration, for which many migrants are looking for work. In October 2024, Motas, the applicant of the Egyptian and asylum, wanted to meet his father. The father, Attef (61), came to Italy 20 years ago. The 28 -year -old Motas crossed the Mediterranean from Libya, where he was arrested and tortured. After recovered in international water, Italy became one of the first asylum sent directly to the Albanian Host Center.
“It was about 200 meters away from the coast of Lambaleedza,” Motas said. “A translator told us that we are going to transfer to Albania, and said, ‘Now, it will ask for asylum. If it is accepted, it will go to Italy.
Motas stayed in Albania for a week. The Rome Court rejected the detention, saying that Motas’s home country was not recognized as “safe”. The Motas’ case has exposed the failures of a entire organization aimed at exempting the administration of asylum applicants in Italy, which is now addressed by the European Court.
Motasin’s lawyer considers that the procedures for the diaspora are considered “unfounded” and that the “safe nations” violated the Italian Constitution.
“In the eyes of human rights, Mottas’s lawyer Genaro Sandoro said that the prevention of a person in the third country is today Albania, but tomorrow’s Tunisia, Niger or other country, the opportunity to use their fundamental rights,” said Motas. “My customer in Albania, who has two steps from Italy, could not contact him before the trial. I saw that he was tortured in Libya only during the audience and fled from Egypt by harassment.”
Dobe: “The European Union Regulatory Plan for Return is different from the Italia-Alphonia Ethics”
Domas Dobe, a supporter of the European Union Regulatory Plan on repayment, and the vice president of the European People’s Party Committee, withdrew himself from the Italy-Albeania norm. Tobe explained that the European proposal is aimed at seeking centers that only return to people who have already rejected asylum. Tobe supported the need to cooperate with third countries outside Europe:
“I am not saying that this is easy. It is not us to choose the neighbors of Europe. I ask a lot of criticism from the left, but I ask you from the right. It says that there should be no cooperation. But there is no solution.”
Top stressed that those who have the right to seek asylum in Europe should be protected and the refusal results should be effective.
In 2018, the European Commission said the centers that were returned were illegal. Critics argue, and now, at a time, intensive rights related to the EU are often integrated into the EU general policy.
