Duration for sports litigation … is it logical?
The problem of the Saudi al -Nasr Club protest against Rafe al -Rafei Ruwili is being questioned by its third month’s entry, but it has been seen from the Disciplinary Committee, from the Appeal Committee, to the last appeal, without permanently deciding on the three legal degrees.
The “Sports Arbitration Center” is the highest stages of sports litigation in Saudi Arabia, and this is the center of the Saudi Olympic Committee’s umbrella (a high and unique authority to distinguish sports disputes and conflicts related to sports by arbitration or mediation.
The case chapters dated February 28, submitting an al -Nasr official protest against the legality of al -Ruli’s legitimacy in the two teams match in the Saudi Professional League competitions, and demanding points of al -Smi’s loser match, based on what he did not fulfill the regular conditions for his registration.
The Disciplinary Committee refuses to protest, thereby submitting an appeal that al -Nasr is also rejected; Although the sports season reached the end, the club was inspired to increase the jury that was not issued by the referee until Friday afternoon; The fact that the AFC Champions League’s Elite affects the resolution of the Champions League in relation to the success of the Saudi League, without seeing the results of the Saudi League.
This delay raises repeated questions amid demands to determine sensitive cases of virtual judicial time in the Saudi Sports Community, especially those that affect the formation of competitions, and to decide on the tough time roof to judge such files.
According to the rules and regulations, the match is to be objected to the observer and adherence to the period to demonstrate the protest, through the period required for the disciplinary committee, the first level of the litigation, and the legal and periods of the problems until its decision to testify to appeal.
Some have asked: The time to adopt new legal articles that accelerate the decisions of problems with direct influence, especially in the decisive stages of the league, are in the decisive stages of success, and his protest in front of him in February, and in front of him, in front of him, before him, in front of him, in front of him. After the controversial legal dispute between the rejection of the “discipline” and the appeal of the unit every time (twice), the appeals committee supported the third rejection case, and the legal path of Arabism was not clear that it was satisfied; And it refuses to “appeal” to stabbing by the decision?
The problems of Victory, Arabism, unity and success are not the first problems of taking this period of time, but in its history have seen many problems that are needed and more in its history, perhaps in the case of Muhammad Nos in 2022, when the Center was issued by the Center, the monk was successful, and it was not according to the temporary actions, but it was not according to the temporary actions. Ended with crescent prevention from suspension and registration. Instead, it took several months to respond to the Saudi Sports Arbitration Center due to temporary measures, and the matter was rejected.
In 2011, he was one of the most prominent cases that led to a widespread conflict of the unit of the unit that reached the International Sports Arbitration Court (CASS), and began with the disciplinary committee’s decision to remove three points from the unit, thus the “appeal” due to the first section of the first section of the first section of the first section of the appeal. And after more than two months, the unit was rejected. The decision of judicial committees at the Saudi Football Association has been approved.
In 2023, the al-tai protest against the legitimacy of the Gulf Player, Maher Sherma was almost two months.
Saudi Sport is not the only one in the open “sports judiciary” experiences; The European Stadiums have seen similar cases, including the Violation of the Terms of Farming Financial Play, which began in the Manchester City and the Fair Economic play began in 2020 and became famous for the century trial.
The Barcelona Club’s famous “Nigra” case, which disclosed the suspicions of financial relations between the club and the arbitration officer, has been reading just fair since 2023, and Barcelona has been accused of bribery in May 2024, although the Barcelona court has been accused of bribery.
Chelsea Midfielder and Arsenal Midfielder case in 2014 comes as one of the most popular issues that extend between his and FIFA for many years against his agreement with the Lokomotive Moscow with the Russian Club Lokomotive Moscow.
Sports problems are part of the un distinguished legal system that cannot be distinguished from their natural means, but some of the problems that affect the alignment of championships and some problems that affect the results are delayed by the opening doors and the fast -paced doors and the new parties will have to accelerate the pace with the speed of the case.
In general, parallel to the sports championships determined at a moment, justice is at the same speed, before the law also becomes an opponent of competition.
