Nearly 200 students and journalists determined by demonstrations in Istanbul

Advertisement

Dozens of people, including journalists, participated in the Istanbul court on Friday, accused of participating in banned demonstrations and violating police orders during the arrest of the city’s mayor. EmosluOpposition.

Imamoklu Recep tayyip erdoganHe was arrested on March 19 and was arrested a few days after corruption.

The detention was widely thought to have political motivations and led to nationally struggles. The government emphasizes that the Turkish judiciary authority is independent and that the courts are independent.

A total of 189 defendants, most of them college students, began to protect the allegations that did not comply with the participation of prohibited demonstrations. Some were also accused of having a gun.

Four photographers and three journalists reported the demonstrations. However, on Friday, the court decided to separate its case from the main hearing.

Are calculated between defendants More than 2000 detained For the participation of the country’s largest mass manifestations for more than a decade.

During the initial hearing, the lawyers demanded the release of all 189 defendants.

Terin Doka Qi, a student of Istanbul University, was detained at home on March 24 and released with dozens of other students last week.

Following an integrated effort to be released from his parents, many of them have raised their daily awareness at the threshold of Chilivri’s arrest west of Istanbul.

“I spent 18 days at the Silvri Prison and I was released a week ago,” said Toya Qi. “We all missed the choices. Some people lost their job.” “This is not a legal process; this is a process that the law is expected,” he added.

The father of another defendant Avni Kundohan was one of the hundreds of people gathered at the courtroom to support the students. “They participated in democratic, peaceful and legitimate activities. They used their constitutional rights and violated their rights,” he says. “We demand the judgment of the acquittal for our children.”