Information War India Pakistan Operation Sindur .

Pakistan is spreading a continuous campaign against India. Pakistan’s campaign was historically after Operation Sindur. Old video, video game footage and fake photos were used to kill Indian jet planes, arrest pilots and destroy airports. But the Chinese media, especially the Global Times and Sinhua, who worked against the country during the Indo -Pak War on their Twitter handle, undoubtedly exited the tolerance for any sovereign country. From the recklessness of the Chinese media treated on the occasion of the Indo-Pak War, it seems that this is part of the conspiracy of China’s well-being against India. His Twitter handle was said to exaggerate Pakistan’s claims and blame India for regional occupation.

In addition, Pakistan and Chinese hackers targeted Indian government websites, banks and security companies. Attempts to attack DDOs on the Indian Defense Ministry’s website. In order to spoil the image of India, false information has been spread about human rights, minority issues and lessons such as Kashmir. Obviously, India will have to work very hard on this front. To deal with the war, India must create a full terminal system, just as the S -400 nation saved the country from Pakistan missiles.

This is the reason why the Indian government today blocked the Chinese government, Sinhua and Turkish news agency TRT World (TRT World) X accounts of X accounts. The move was taken during the Indo-Pakistani war, and later due to false information and advertising allegations against these companies against India. In particular, the Global Times and Sinhua promoted Pakistan’s claims like Indian Jets and destroyed the air base. The TRT world has spread false information on the use of Turkish -launched drones. In today’s context, it is clear how the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of India can tolerate such an act.

Only China and Turkey, the Catari News Channel and the website Alajjira are making lies against India

It is unfortunate that Chinese and Turki knobs are blocked, but the Katari news channel Al Jazira has not been blocked. However, it also spread toxic information against India. For example, the channel was talking about Pakistan’s language on issues such as the arrest of the Indian pilot, demolishing jet airplanes and blaming Kashmir policy. The reason for not preventing Al Jazeera may be the global access and strategic borders of India’s strong economic and diplomatic relations (especially LNG supplies). India responded to Al Jazeera’s claims, by the fact that the Pip is true test, by diplomatic response. When the government showed courage to shut down a powerful country like China, why is this warmth showed with Qatar?

1-Why should we wait to take war against news agencies involved in the anti-India campaign?

The foreign handle of India has always poisoned against India. But why did you not understand why India had to wait for the war? India always chooses the right time to retaliate such as a ceasefire or diplomatic opportunity. For example, after Operation Sindur, India used the May 11 press conference to dismiss Pakistani claims.

In fact, India must establish a centralized information war cell, which must coordinate with the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the cyber agencies. This unit can be used to use trained experts and AI-based equipment to respond to advertising. India must create the most active and integrated appearance in X -like X -like forums, such as promoting counter -interactions by official accounts and influential people. India will be able to create an action plan to quickly eliminate false information by increasing the federation with technology companies (eg, Google).

2-No company, should those involved in the anti-Indian campaign have a constituency?

Some Pakistan, Chinese and other countries are conducting anti -India stories on X. Reporters like Al Jasira’s Ali Mustafa issued a statement on India’s arrest of a female pilot in Operation Sindur.
Some of India, deliberately or unknowingly encourage foreign advertising. For example, some X handles shared al -Jazeera’s Kashmir reports without trial. Chinese and Pakistan hackers carried out DDOS attacks on Indian websites, and giants operate an anti -India hashtag (#Indiburning, #Munirout) on X. Therefore, some handlers from other countries, including India, should be closed.

China 3, 3-Why does India face the loss of democracy in China?

China has severe control over foreign media, while India promotes independence and expression of freedom as a democratic country. This is part of the Constitution of India and the global image. However, India suffers higher losses such as the Global Times, Sinhua and Al Jazeera. This is because India avoids censorship so that newspapers on independence will be avoided. Global times, India focuses on blocking X accounts of the Sinhua and TRD world, which is on May 2025, facts-Jansa, opposite interactive and targeting. Despite the loss of losses, India’s strategy is long -term reliable and diplomatic gains, which are different from countries like China.

China’s big firewall prevents many foreign news websites (e.g. BBC, New York Times, Reuters). X, Google and other social media forums are also banned in this country. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) controls the described by the Global Times and the Sinhua -like blower. Foreign journalists must face strict monitoring and visa barriers. In this way, China operates unilaterally against India for its people and global observers, Arunachal Pradesh or Galwan Valley (2020).

Therefore, India should treat it by tight. Suppose the media is banned in another country in China, and then the media of anti -democratic countries such as China must be banned in the same way in India.

4-foreign challenges but also domestic challenges

Some Indian personnel or groups promote foreign advertising deliberately or unknowingly. For example, during Operation Sindur, some Indian X manipulators arrested Al Jasira’s fake news, such as Pilot Sivani Singh, which increased communal tension. Fake news spreads rapidly on social media such as WhatsApp and X forums. For example, foreign propagandists spread fake news about the attack on Gurudwara (2020 Video), which has been shared by some Indian groups without trial, which led to tension in the Sikh community.

Some Indian political groups or individuals promote the anti -government campaign by accepting foreign immortality. For example, in 2025, some opposition leaders shared al -Jazeera’s Kashmir reports, which described the Pip’s side.

Some Indian journalists, influential people or small media reconsider foreign promotion without trial. For example, during the Indo -Pak War, some local news websites shared the claims of the Global Times claims, such as the Indian S -400 destruction. Local influential persons and media spread foreign spread, which strengthens anti -India tension. The sermon can weaken the government’s credibility and stimulate opposition groups.

The 5-East policy must be said that action is against the nation, which is not against the government

India requires a clear and obvious policy to prevent the anti -India campaign, the anti -Global Times, Al Jazeera or domestic sources (local influential person, social media account, etc.). These policy measures ensure that focus on national anti -national activities (threatening national security, social harmony or sovereignty). India is already taking action through PIB Truth Test, Information Technology Act and Cyber ​​Surveillance. For example, X accounts of the Global Times, Sinhua and TRT world were blocked. A clear policy is to reduce the censorship allegations, political abuse and communal stress. This should include legal structure, independent surveillance, information war division and public awareness.