Half of the Mexican did not know that the judicial elections were Sunday

Voting Institute, Buntia & Margvez interviewed 1,000 Mexican people Mexico’s first judicial electionsIt will take place on Sunday 1 June.

Here are four trips SurveyThe El Universal Newspaper was held from May 15 to 20.

Only 50% of the Mexican people know the elections held on Sunday

Only half of the 1,000 surveyors knew that elections would be held in June.

They said they knew that an additional 2% of the voters would be held this year, but they did not know when.

Four out of ten (42%) of the voted are not known when elections will be held. The remaining 6% quoted a date other than this year.

Not promoting judicial elections And one of the possible reasons for the lack of interest in them is the lack of awareness of the date they take.

Budget cuts in Mexico’s National Elections (INE) refers to low funding to promote participating in the election. (Daniel Augusto/Quartoskoro)

At the same time last year, a poll conducted by Boundia & Margvez was held by 78% of Mexican people that the presidential election (Claudia Shinepham won) will be held in June 2024.

President Shinebam argues that Mexico’s judiciary is necessary to renew the judiciary through elections to eliminate country’s courts such as corruption and unity. He is urging citizens to come out this Sunday and vote Duplicate.

Are sure that fewer than 4 of 10 Mexican people will vote

Only 37% of the voters said they were determined to vote in the judicial elections, in which Mexican would elect nearly 900 federal judges, including nine Supreme Court judges.

An additional 24% said it was “possible” to vote on Sunday.

Two of the 10 (18%) said they still did not know whether they would vote or not, while 10% of respondents said they were unlikely to vote.

An additional 10% of respondents said they would not vote.

The election example for the Mexican Supreme Court
More than 3,000 candidates seek to elect judges on June 1, including 64 candidates in the Supreme Court. (@caguirrearias/x)

El Universal noted that the referendum responders are trying to “exaggerate” their own voting in the elections.

47% of those who have identified themselves as supporters of the ruling Morena party have said that they will vote. Only 31% of the opposition supporters said they would vote.

Most of the voting of Maranna supporters (most of the Mexican population, according to polls) may help the ruling party close to the ruling party, such as the Supreme Court judges Lineia Padres Quadarama And Perta Maria mayor Lujan, they Aimed at staying in their positions after the election. During the six -year period of former President Andrez Manuel Lopez Obeader, the two women became Supreme Court judges.

The quarter of the Mexican is no interest in the judicial elections

The voted quarters said they had no interest in the judicial elections, resulting in the resulting. Mexican Congress’s approval last year of controversial judicial reform Lopas Oprador presented.

A similar percentage (23%) of similar respondents claimed that they were only a little in the elections, or light.

One of the five respondents said that (21%) was very interested in the elections and 29% were somewhat interested.

Most Mexican disagrees with the former president’s claim that Mexico could become a tyranny

Only 29% of respondents claimed that former President Ernesto Jedilo had criticized the 2024 judicial reform and the upcoming judicial elections.

As Mexico News Daily reported earlier this month.

Portrait of Ernesto Jedilo
Mexican does not agree with most of the warnings of former President Ernesto Jedilo on the upcoming tyranny. (Andrea Mursia Mansivovas/Quartoskoro)

Jedilo said, “This is the only dictators to control the judiciary,” said Morena, who is trying to impose a “regime” to make “spontaneous and false” decisions according to her own political interests.

Funtia & Marcvez asked the respondents to give an opinion on Jedloo’s claim that “Mexico may stop being a democracy and become a tyranny.”

Six of the 10 people who responded said they did not accept the claim. Within the meeting, 37% said they did not accept the demand, and 23% said they did not accept it.

Only 7% of those voted claimed that they were very agreed with Jedloo’s claim, while 20% said they agreed with it.

Among the opposition supporters, 47% of the former president’s statement claimed that they were very or somewhat agreed with the former president’s statement, but a little higher percentage (49%) said they did not accept it.

With reports from Universal

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button