European Union examines new security financial mechanism with third countries to increase military readiness

European Finance Ministers will analyze a plan to create a new intermediate company called “European Security mechanism” (MED) to provide security related loans and cooperation with third countries such as the United Kingdom, Norway or Switzerland.
“In the case of the need to maintain the prudent budget positions, the investment for security cannot continue without proper coordination,” Polish Finance Minister Andrej Tomaski said in a letter sent to his colleagues last Friday.
The proposed mechanism reflects the latest British idea of a sophisticated restructuring fund. This includes the abbreviation of debts and the centralization of safety acquisition to reduce costs.
“Because security costs are a national unique, you can provide the most effective response to this inter -government model inadequate security funding,” Domaski said.
During the informal Warsaw meeting on April 11 and 12, the UE-27 finance ministers will be with their United Kingdom, Norway and Switzerland’s colleagues, where the political document of Brussels will be discussed.
The Broqal document proposes that the EU must be a unique shareholder in order to ensure coordination of compliance with third countries based on the European Bank model for reconstruction and development.
According to Brookal Intelligence, the EDM’s mandate includes the creation of a unique security market and even the rights of strategic military assets, such as information and advanced missile information or technology – measures to reduce the tax burden of member states.
Although the current European stability mechanism (Mee), the proposed fund does not require the contribution of all 27 EU member states. This may expand their financial limits to third subscribers and members outside the Europe.
Members of the mechanism must contribute to their economic dimension, military and/or active costs, and decisions may be made according to capital allocation or qualified majority votes.
This fund may support the pre -serving members by allocating out of interest -free loans or by allocating pre -sequences, a percentage of equipment purchased more than these members.
EU Security Financial Instructions Does not offer correct offers
US President Donald Trump has asked NATO members to increase NATO members to 5% – this is very difficult for eight European NATO members who have spent less than 2% of less than 2% in 2024.
In response, European countries have promised more money to strengthen European security – but the highest budget among themselves will not collect the capacity gaps.
Prokal researchers argue that current EU security financial equipment does not offer appropriate privileges to monitor Kremlin’s military production.
The document argues that the current tools such as the European Security Fund (Central Bank), the ASAP and the Real Europe are “very small to solve the national pro problem or provide ‘strategic facilities’ such as military satellites.”
National security markets continue to dominate by local champions. For example, in France, two major security companies represented 69% of sector internal sales by 2024.
Researchers say that this fragment approach, acquisition and current technology gaps should be resolved in a hurry, as the US is increasing from its traditional guardian in Europe.
As? As? In addition to the European Security mechanism, Brocal recommends expanding the role of current organisms such as the European Security Agency, such as planning, acquisition and funding.
It recommends a new tool, such as the use of the Gov -19 infection for temporary support for the temporary support of unemployment in emergency, and strengthens the cooperation of permanently structured cooperation (neck) for safety and safety for the creation of strategic facilities and reducing the US dependencies.
The document states that if there is a major reform in both the demand and security market supply in Europe, Europe has an opportunity to address and reduce Europe.