The Special Court that Western countries want to create a crime against Ukraine will not be default until Vladimir Putin continues to be president of the Russian Federation.
The same rule also applies to Russian Prime Minister Migyl Michustin and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Two European employees of the process and spoke to the Eurnew.
The accusation of these high staff is allowed only if the defendants are physically physically in the room – this is unlikely, because Russia does not recognize the Ukraine invasion as a criminal and firmly opposes cooperation with the West.
Alternatively, a test can be done to the default after leaving the office.
Conditions are defined in the plan that is a legal basis for the creation of a special court within the European Council, which is a organization that protects Strasburg -based human rights. This organization is not part of the EU (EU), but the camp is closely involved in this process.
The technical work is completed At the end of March, During a meeting called “Central Committee” in Strasburg, it created three unique documentary projects: bilateral agreement between Ukraine and Europe, a contract to define the administration of the Special Court and the Special Court.
The signature is scheduled for May 9, which is in line with the day of Europe, although the right calendar depends on political support.
A EU employee says that the limits for the default are considered a “dedication” between countries. After several months, it is now a “closed business” without the opportunity to change before the presentation.
“At the end of the day, this is policy and negotiation,” the official said.
Once the Kiev is signed, the speech will be submitted to vote in the Parliamentary Legislative Assembly of the European Council, which merges with representatives of 46 countries that are part of the organization. Shortly after the war began, Russia was expelled.
The contract is required to recognize the contract, which requires a two -thirds majority, which is practically guaranteed for wide support for the initiative between member states.
Some countries, which have accepted Russian favorable positions such as Hungary and Serbia, may avoid or oppose individual homes.
It is expected that there will be democratic countries outside the continent like Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan, adding this effort and expanding their justification.
The United States who started the approach to Russia is unlikely to participate. During the government of Joe Biden, the country supported the quest for justice in Ukraine, but after Donald Trump’s swearing -in, the orientation changed.
The US did not attend the Central Committee meeting at the end of March. It is unknown how Trump’s persuasion can affect legal proceedings on the peace agreement.
Advertisement“More than 38 states have expressed their political support for the formation of the court and the EU”.A spokesman for the European Council for the European Council said.
Once the contracts are approved, the court is expected to be headquartered in a long -traditional hacker in international law that already supports the International Court of Justice (DIJ) and the International Criminal Court (TPI).
Putin and one of its representatives to illegally transform Ukrainian children to Russia have been guaranteed to seize the ICT separately.
Justice
The idea of creating court to-thisis Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelenski has been defended for over three years to ensure the responsibility of Putin’s large -scale invasion for the occupation.
AdvertisementUnlike war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are used for people who do atrocities such as military officers and mercenaries. The crime of aggression It is a leadership offense aimed at the person responsible for controlling the state.
Occupation may have an invasion, a profession, a connection, the lock of the ports or any other attacks.
According to the ICC, the crime of occupation is associated with the “planning, product, beginning or execution, and the political or military action of a state, or by its character, gravity and quantity, creating an obvious violation of the United Nations Charter.
This often makes Putin a defendant in the future judgment.
AdvertisementAlthough the ICC has established the jurisdiction of aggression crimes Emantas de KampalaThis applies only to the countries and countries of the countries that are part of the Rome Act. Russia, the US and China have not signed up.
This is why Western allies have examined the desire to create a temporary court with powers to determine the particular case of the Russian war against Ukraine.
“Without aggression, there will be no war crimes,” said High Representative Gaja Kallas At the beginning of February.
“Therefore, it is very important to have aggression and responsibility. There is no one from Russia. No one from the direction of Russia is untouchable.”
Advertisement“It is also very important to send the identity that unruly crimes promoted new occupations,” he added.
From the beginning of the conversation, the possibility of a test to default is an important factor.
Since Kremlin refused to provide its top employees, the guards of this model believe that this is the only way to provide minimal justice. Critics, however, say that a test for default is considered illegal fraud.
“I think this is more than the symbolic importance of the court, and I think it is legal. I think it is politics.
Advertisement“I personally believe that it will not be a fake company in the hack. Without impact, but it will serve in the coming years, and history will make this court more positively judged.”
State leaders, government leaders and foreign ministers are regarded as an additional obstacle for criminal activity.
“However, international law is being created. Personal immunity is not a letter to punishment,” the European Council spokesman said.
“The Europea Council believes that the formula founded for the Special Court on this issue would be sufficient to confirm the responsibility and war penalties.”
AdvertisementThe last offense was taken to court, and during the Nuremberg test after World War II, the accusation was called “crimes against peace.”
