Brando Benfi, an European parliamentary age -elder, told Euronevs that Hungary plans to use AI -based facial recognition for special participants in the LGPDigia+ EU regulations.
An Italian MEP has announced that the Hungary’s proposal to find participants in March in March is responsible for controlling the European AI Law and Data Protection Rules.
Last Tuesday, the Hungary Parliament decided to ban the parade – which usually takes place in June – it threatened the rules of public meetings overseas and the threatening the fines of 200 000 forinds (500 euros), retrieving the right to use digital facial recognition equipment to identify participants.
According to the MEP Brando Benfi (Italy/Socialists and Democrats), the co -operative organization of the European Parliament, which is responsible for the implementation of the AI Act, this will be a clear violation of the new EU AI law.
Benny told EuroNus that the AI law prohibits the use of biometric rooms to identify protesters to identify opponents.
Benefi says the first big test for historical law
Benfi, who held the AI law in Parliament as a partner, can only sell facial recognition organizations in Europe in accordance with these rules, otherwise they will lose the license to do so. Meo urged the European Commission to analyze the issue.
“We are still collecting data. We are in the early stages of implementing the AI Act. Hungary will be the first big test for us and the Commission should be very clear in this regard,” he said.
Tamas Latman, EU lawmaster, Hungary, has agreed to violate the Hungary Regulatory AI law on social networks, referring to the crimes of justifying the use of AI tools. “In all other cases, its use is prohibited,” Latman said.
Regardless of the use of AI law, he considers the use of facial recognition technology in the March environment and has a clear violation of the EU public data security regulation.
Difference after actual time facial analysis and event
A spokesman for a European Commission told Euronevs that the AI legal legal assessment said that Hungarian police are using real -time facial recognition software or after the event, the so -called processing.
The identification of the protesters’ real time biometric identification is prohibited by the law, the immediate terrorist threat, searching for the missing, or the approval of the previous judiciary, he said.
The spokesman said, “Identification of biometric identification at distance, including facial recognition, is a high risk use, which requires transparency, responsibility and impact estimations on basic rights,” the spokesman said, noting the rules that affect the post -event identity, which is in effect in March in August.
Euronevas asked the Hungarian government to comment on his proposal to use technology.
In Hungary, the National Center for Experties and Research has the right to analyze facial data. Since 2015, the system has been collecting biometric data from citizens from identity tickets and driving cards. At the request of the police, an instructional database seeks a letter. Hungarian media reports that the door for the use of facial recognition can be changed to public meeting rules to control problems such as traffic violations and waste. Experts, however, questioned whether the technical resources needed to look at the parade of pride were in the administration.
The EU AI Act – which regulates the AI tools in accordance with the risk they represent the community – came into effect last August. Its rules began to be used gradually: by 2027, the law will be fully implemented. Each volume member states must create a national regulator to monitor the compliance of companies with the AI law by Ai this year. These companies will cooperate with the European Authority AI office supporting national authorities.
