Chirac Paswan returned to Bihar before the elections …
Union minister and Lok leader Johnshakthi Party (Ram Vilas) Chirac Paswan has pointed out in the legislature in the Bihar election. After this, the ‘Chirac for cm’ posters have begun to appear in the entire state. Chirac’s party is demanding LJPR 33 assembly seats. In the meantime, the 2020 Bihar election is causing a stir in the National Democratic Alliance (NTA). Sirac’s goal is to make his claim for the first time in NTA after Nitish Kumar. LJPR leaders say that there is still a shortage of such a leader in the BJP, with its BAN Bihar capture, and he can compete directly in the Tejashvi Yadav competition.
What happened in 2020?
In the last election of the Bihar Assembly, Chirac Paswan was looking for 30 seats. If the demand was not met, he announced that he would only contest the Chirac election. Chirac himself called Prime Minister Modi’s Hanuman and supported the BJP, but Nitish Kumar’s Janata Dal (United) dismissed the candidates in the quota. He then gave tickets to many BJP insurgents, and then he was said to be the hand of the saffron party behind the move. Behind this Chirac move, there was a strategy that would harm the possibilities of the Grand Alliance by transferring a portion of the anti -NDA vote bank to its court. In the closest match, the voting stock of the Grand Alliance and NTA was almost equal (37 percent). 243 -NTA won 125 seats in the Seat Bihar Assembly, and then the Grand Alliance was stunned at 110 seats.
The Chirac -led LJP later fielded candidates for 137 seats, and its candidates were successful in winning more votes than winning, in which NTAs won 40 seats and 32 in 32 seats. The JDU was a great deal due to Chirac’s party candidates. Nitish Kumar’s decision to become the chief ministerial candidate is part of the JDU allotment in the JDU allotment. As a result, the JDU, which won 71 seats in 2015, came to 43 in 2020. C.M.
The LJP damaged JDU in 33 seats. In 28 such places, the LJP received the highest number of votes from the edge of Vin-Lales, where the JDU came second. The Chirac party finished second in five and JDU was third. The LJP won only one seat, but spoiled JDU’s mathematics.
What is the root cause of JDU-LJP RAR
There is also a historical reason behind the embarrassing relationship between Chirac Paswan and Nitish Kumar’s parties. In the 2005 Bihar election, the LJP became the choice of Dalit voters. The party then won 29 seats with 12 percent of the votes. Then the results of Bihar were hung, and no alliance was unavailable. The key to power came to the LJP, and Ram Vilas Paswan was adamant at the request of the Muslim CM. Six months later, the legislative elections were held again, and then the LJP maintained voting share, but the party’s seats were reduced to 10, with a majority in Bihar. The government of Nitish Kumar implemented the recommendation of the Mahadalid Commission and created a separate class in the name of Mahadalid for the castes of the sidelines of the sidelines in 2007.
This move by Nitish, with Ram Vilas Paswan (father of Chirac Paswan) and his party, created his land among Dalit voters, with the strategy of weakening his party. At the time, Bihar had 16 percent Dalit population, and six percent of them were Dusad. The Nitish government gave the Mahadalit status to all the Dalit castes except Paswan. From this, the JDU benefits are different, but the LJP has suffered losses. In the 2010 Bihar election, the party’s referendum fell from 11 percent to seven percent in the last election, near six percent in 2020. The seats of the LJP fell to three in 2005 to 2010 and then 2020 assembly elections. In the Nitish era, the dominance of the LJP has diminished because he has become the leader of Mahadalitz, and the Paswan family has only been reduced to his caste.
LJP’s performance in elections
By 2020, after 2005 in Bihar elections, there is a tendency to decline in the performance of the LJP. In 2005, the LJP, which contested the election alone, contested the 2010 election with the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) to three seats. Prior to the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, the LJP joined the NTA and contested the coalition with the BJP in the 2015 Assembly elections. In the 2020 Assembly elections, the party alone can enter the field, and only one seat can win. Unlike the assembly elections, the party’s strike rate in the Lok Sabha elections is one hundred or around it. In 2014, the LJP won seven seats and won six. In 2019, the party won six in six and five in five in 2024.
2020 What lessons for failure
The biggest lesson of defeat in the 2020 election for Chirac Paswan’s party is that he cannot take the risk of contesting the elections alone. In the 2020 election, his party was called voting. If you want to strengthen your place in Bihar politics, Chirac is important to be with alliance at this time. Chirac has clearly stated that Nitish Kumar will face the face of the LJPR workers. The Strategy of Chirac is to win more and more seats for the party by creating a six percent vote bank of the LJBR.
Chirac Paswan’s goal is to return the party’s 12.6 percent voting level in the leadership of his father. Chirac Bus wants to make a Ban SC feast with a Paswan caste. According to Bihar’s caste census, the Paswan Society has a 5.31 per cent population in the state. Now the LJP Chirac has implemented a plan to compete from a public place, so behind it is given the reason for strengthening the party’s infiltration to the party’s strategy. Chirac’s election entry at the JDU camp can be seen as another trick of the BJP to weaken Nitish Kumar.
Deputy Chief Minister Samrath Chaudhary in the Bihar government may be embarrassed by such possibilities, and its ambition must become the first. Chirac is young, Ban is considered a Bihar leader and is popular among young people. In the C-Voter survey, Chirac was described by 5.8 percent of the people in April, which increased to 10.6 per cent in May. At the same time, Emperor Chaudhry’s popularity fell from 12.5 percent to 6.6 per cent in May.
