Ashoka University Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad arrested – Mahmudabad should not be arrested, but will the professor respond to these things? .

There is a rudeness in the arrest of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad at the University of Ashoka. The professor, who has a relationship with Lucknow’s well -known Rajwada family, is also a national spokesman for the Samajwadi Party. In fact, they seem to be unreasonable for people for many reasons. Because he has not written any word directly in his post, it is illegal. Even some BJP leaders did not digest the arrest of Mahmudabad. But Mahmudad has indirectly removed the arrows, which are very dangerous. In this way, they are more dangerous than the illiterate people who raise the slogan of Pakistan on the road. This is because they become an ardent opponent of the Indian Army and the elected government of India, even in the war.

While writing Sortical on Facebook, the same policy has been adopted, which before the independence of India, British Raj used to take responsibility for the full plight, not when he was running a pen. The hatred of the English must arise, and they must clearly escape the law. This is the reason why the majority of the Hindu community from Mahmudabad has a lot of distress. Let us first see what the reasons for Professor Ali Khan appear to be innocent, and he was deliberately involved. We then discuss what the reasons for them seem to be right for them to arrest.

1. Violation of freedom of expression

In the post of Ali Khan, the press conference of Colonel Sofia Qureshi was described as a symbol of India’s diversity and raised questions for social justice. He wrote that the popularity of the Hindus would be meaningful only when the gang violence and the Muslim community illegally solve problems like bulling. There is no two concepts that this post is a common social concept, none of them are criminal or communal.

This is the reason why Asoka University teachers, more than 1,100 academics, writers and human rights activists demanded their release, that the arrest is unfounded and unbearable, which weakens democratic values.

2. Weak legal basis

The allegations made by the Haryana police in the FIR are not so special, and the police immediately take one another. Haryana State Women’s Commission President Rench Bhatia described her opinion on a complaint and promoted communal unrest for military female officers. Along with this, BJP Yuva Morcha General Secretary Yogesh Jaderi has complained that he has been accused of dangerous and unity of India’s sovereignty and unity, affected religious sentiments and benefited the foreign powers.

Legal experts and researchers believe that these allegations are ambiguous and high. His post did not insult military officers, but was appreciated. There is no direct communal or anti -national report in the post of Mahmudabad.

3. The abuse of the military ORS Ravas

In the post of Ali Khan, a press conference of Colonel Sofia Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh was described as a symbol of India’s strength and diversity. Critics say that his opinion was wrongly introduced to military personnel. His arrest is considered an attempt to use the Honor Rava as a political weapon, which weakens the army’s ITY blouse.

Will Mahmudabad answer these questions?

1- Can the achievements of female players call hypocrisy?

Mahmudabad writes in his post … In the end, I am very happy to praise many right -wing commentators Colonel Sofia Qureshi, but they must claim that the victims of the gang Linning, spontaneous bulldozing and the BJP’s hatred police should be protected as Indian citizens. It is important to present the achievements of two female players, but the show must be changed to underground realistically, otherwise it is hypocritical.

If Mahmudabad had written the same thing on normal days, it would be normal. But during the war, a scholar is expected to make such comments about the Indian Army at least. Women’s achievements in the Indian Army may be less than men. But as a symbol, there is a lot. Pakistan cannot even think about this. Women in India are throwing warplanes. Women have been given a place in the world’s lowest countries in the war. India is one of the few countries that receive this honor. Colonel Sofia Qureshi and Vyomika Singh are not just an event. The professor also knows that Pakistan is discrediting India by spreading the views of people like him.

2.

Professor Mahmudabad wrote a post that night, and on the 26th the Hindus were killed by their religious identity. In that post, Mehmudabad was condemned by the terrorist incident, but the terrorists did not analyze the jihadi law and its mood after India’s retaliation. Operation begins on May 6th. Operation begins on May 6th. To provide information, Colonel Sofia Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh come before the media. Mahmudabad did not lose it as a strategy of the Modi government. Although the military has dealt with Pakistan, the details of Muslims in India are slapped on Facebook. Just as the terrorists in Bahlgam killed Hindu tourists, tell Modi that our religion is in danger.

Terrorists do not understand that only Muslims are not only suppressed in religious defects. Hindus were also crushed. Like the Ground in Bahlgham. Like Killed in Murshidabad. Why only Hindus, Muslims are killed somewhere. Somewhere in the victim of Christians or any other religion. But, all these things cannot be understood and cannot be considered by Professor Mahmudabad. If they only treat Muslims as victims, understand that this is the same agenda found in the Muslim Brotherhood.

According to the professor, it is a hypocrisy that Colonel Sophia is in front, while gang linning with minorities in the country, and they are falling prey to bulldozers. The professor knows that Muslims in the world are not in the Islamic nation or a community like the United States. It is clear that he does such a thing during Professor Mahmudabad’s war, and he has sympathy for terrorists. It cannot come out directly from the mouth, so it comes out.

2-Is the ground reality in front of the caste Muslims?

In his post, Mahmudabad writes that the reality of ordinary Muslims is different, which the government tried to show. Can the professor be acknowledged? Not probably. Are there discrimination against Muslims in government programs? Is there any discrimination in jobs, education and health facilities? Are Muslims from anywhere in the military and cricket with secondary status? Not all of this is in response. Yes, Pakistan certainly promotes this. At the same time, people who have such thought out about Indian Muslims must believe that officials like Colonel Sofia Qureshi are only to show their face. Where did the Hindus go to Pakistan? Mahmudabad, with his convenience, writes his positions as Colonel Sofia and Owaisi as representatives of Muslims. Because if they only consider Indians, their agenda cannot improve.

Your post is sufficient to promote the hatred of the Indian nation among the crores of the country’s Muslims. At the subtle time of the war. The effect and a wandering Muslim can become the hand of Pakistani handers. Only Muslims can wander Hindus? Overall, the enemy will be in good. In such a situation, your Hindustani is the first criminal of the community. The Haryana government has arrested, adjusted, or false, this is a separate debate.

3 War is terrible, but what is terrorism?

Mahmudabad writes this … Some support the war without thinking, but they have never seen the war, or they have never lived in any war or have gone there. Since a pseudo -civil defense training is part of the training, you will not become a soldier, and you cannot always understand the pain that causes losses due to conflict. The war is terrible. Poor people are very difficult, only politicians and security institutions benefit. However, the war is inevitable because politically are naturally violent. At least human history teaches us. We must understand that political struggles have never resolved the military.

Just as Professor Protects the War, I wish they would have opposed terrorism and jihad as much as they would like. It is true that war is always bad, but when there is war to end terrorism, it is always right. Professor wrote the verses of the Mahabharata and described the untouchable of the war. But very wisely, when Krishna tells Arjuna that his rights are necessary for war, it hides the area. India will not attack any country with expansion. This time the war began to provide justice to those killed in Bahlgal.

4 talking about destroying a country, what do you really hear? A full social assassination?

The professor writes that there is a demand for the massacre of a whole community in the pretext of destroying a country. By writing this, Mahmudabad introduces his deviation mood. There is no talk of eradicating Pakistan in India, not a society’s assassination. Yes, if you look at Pakistan, the population of the Hindus is a few and the Sikhs are on the brink of extinction. This is like happening in Afghanistan. India definitely wants to become independent of Balochistan. Are Balochistan people non -Muslim? This was just the same as the destruction of Pakistan in 1971, and then the billions of Muslims gained independence.

Does not evaluate terrorism not evaluating terrorism?

The professors wanted to say the war very wisely. He writes this… how can peace bring peace from war? Does it reduce excessive violence? The world’s military complex is the most effective business – 2.46 trillion – the Pharma industry is 1.6 trillion and $ 750 billion.

The professor never calculated terrorism. After all, Pakistan or the United States, Qatar or Afghanistan. Terrorism in the world is not limited. Countries around the world are making terrorist groups spending billions and trillions of rupees. These governments are trying to do them by these terrorist groups. When Mahmudabad writes his Facebook post, he hides it as politics instead of lighting in terrorist business. This is shameful

However, Mahmudabad has given his comment on Facebook. Yes, his opinion has come forward in front of India. This can be seen as a different challenge. Can be considered a mourning agenda. It can be widely condemned. You can write articles to question. But Professor Mahmudabad does not need to pay more prices. Because what he did, this could be done in a large country like India. So, whatever the Haryana police did with him, he was completely wrong.