An irregular entry with a foreigner with a responsible child is not “helping illegal immigration”.
Released
AdvertisementThe EU court on Tuesday presented the rights of the immigrants by an Italian court that could assist in illegal immigration.
The court’s ruling states that in the case of a national nationality, the EU enters with an irregularly responsible child, and her behavior says that “illegal immigration cannot be assisted.”
“In fact, in this case, the parents accept the duty of his personal responsibility to the child by paying homage to family life and the child, especially in respect of the child,” said Goon Laenerts, president of the EU, the highest legal power.
The court agrees with the Polekna Court, which filed a lawsuit on July 2023, following the entry of the Congo citizen Italy in 2019 by harmful results.
The woman entered the country on the border of the Balogna airport with two children – her daughter and daughter -in -law, after the death of her daughter -in -law, was effectively safe – using false documents.
He said that he fled from the Congo after receiving threats from his former partner and took two children with him because he feared his physical integrity.
It is arrested and processed by facilitating the unauthorized entry in Italy.
It is not considered crime
The Italian court has asked in the European Union Court of Justice (TJUE) whether the 2002 order on the help of secret immigration will apply to the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
The Judicial Affairs Organization suspected that a humanitarian assistance order was issued as a justification for making the accused crime profitable.
In other words, the European Union Court is questions about the common assistance to the illegal entry provided by the EU law.
The court responds that “the behavior of a person who violates people through the borders, along with him, introduces him to the territory of third -party minors of the third party, and he is doing a talented guard.
This behavior is “not a help to secret immigration, EU law seeks to fight”, but “the training of the person from his responsibility from his family relationship and the efficient police of these children.”
In the light of the fundamental rights of the asylum, the Lenirts went further that the explanation was necessary. She explained that she could not be considered irregular in the territory as her woman filed an international demand for international security.
This is the first time that a decision is made on your request, Lenirts explained.
