Federal Judge – Florida prevented from banning social networks for children by the Internet
A. Measurement is one of the most compulsory bans in the United States About the use of social networks when the Republican Governor Ron removes it in 2024. This Act prohibits social networking accounts for children under the age of 14 and requires parents permission for the use of children aged 14 and 15 years. The district judge issued an order on Tuesday by preventing some parts of the Mark Walker Act.
In his decision to grant care of the Computer Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and Netchai Groups, the Walker wrote this law. “Perhaps unconstitutional, “but parents and legislators have admitted that they have” heartfelt concerns “about the impact of social networks on children.
The district judge writes that social networking platforms are banned Groups of some ages are accountable to “to participate in the rights of these young people directly and access the speech.”.
On Tuesday, a federal judge in Atlanta heard the Netchais claims to prevent 2024 Georgia law, which is expected to come into effect on July 1 The verification of the age of accounts on social networks and it is responsible for obtaining parenting permission for accounts for children under 16 years of age.
In Florida and other states that blocked laws, the Internet Trade Group argued that the Georgia Act was the Georgia Act Violating the rights of freedom of expression, which is unclear and excessively expensive.
Although supporting the allegations of industrial groups, the law limits freedom of expression, allowing the Walker Florida Act to come into forcePlatforms are needed to end child accounts under 16 years of age if parents or coaches ask it.
Parents – and some teenagers too – Most concerned with the effects of using social networks on young people. Researchers say that this is a relevant growth in the use and depression and anxiety of social networks among young people.
Matt Shrewers, President of the CCIA Industrial Association and Executive Director, Praised the judge’s order to prevent Florida law. “This decision verifies our argument that the Florida Act will violate the first amendment by preventing and limiting even adults, using some sites to see legal content,” he said.
Florida Attorney General Representative, James Uthmir, Platforms such as Tictoc, Instagram and Snapchat have justified the state’s law and efforts to separate children from social networks when it seems to be almost impossible to escape..
“Florida parents voted in favor of the law to protect children from harmful and sometimes tragic influences by their elected representativesFrom social networks. These platforms have no constitutional right to slave children in their products, ”Uthmir Press Secretary Jay Williams said in a statement.
Williams said they disagreed with court orders that they would appeal to the 11th circuit appeal court.
