Para Brazil has a seventh worst internet, points research | The economy

According to my connection 2025 ranking, the state of Para has occupied the 7th place in the worst states in internet quality in Brazil. The platform survey measures the speed of the Internet and indicates that Belem is 14th among 27 Brazilian capitals in terms of connection speed, and there is no city of para dolls in the nationally ten best categories.
In the entire Internet Quality Ranking, 2,600 cities were analyzed, one of the worst states of Parara, and the worst speeds occupied 7th in the state. In relation to the northern region, Belem is ranked 5th among the seven capitals behind Rio Branco, Porto Welho, Manas and Palmas. Overall, six municipalities in the north are in the best performance in the country, but there is no faster para. Aurora Municipality Do Pare, with 18th place, is classified in the state.
Construction factors
To understand this reality, the technical analyst of the Federal Institute of Para (IFPA) and expert in connectivity explained that Lucena’s research data explained and that the state’s poor quality structural and economic factors in the state are the result of a combination of the internet. Lucena said “low income, low access and quality of quality,” stressed the direct relationship between population income and available internet quality.
Lucena said that connectivity infrastructure is still under development in the state. “There are opportunities for improvement as long as local Internet providers are supported,” he said. The competition between the providers is to benefit the diversity of submission, leading to the breakdown of investment, which affects the quality of the service. To repel this scenario, the expert believes that it is important to invest in the expansion of the fiber optic network, as well as creating a public-private partnership to ensure high quality access to quality.
Solutions
Complex geography and limited infrastructure of the northern region make it difficult to historically expand high speed connectivity. Lucena suggested that “the implementation of public policies that promote infrastructure to local providers, including State Fiber Optic allocation,” has been highlighted by the importance of programs to meet regional specifications.
Regional providers who can provide quality internet such as fibrolyn and WLAN are an example of how local knowledge and specific investments are effective. However, Lucena believes that the lack of incentives and an unfavorable control environment still limits the expansion of these providers. “It is necessary to create financing and technical support lines for small and medium providers, as well as to inspire partnership with local governments,” he said.
With COP 30 in Belem, the expert sees the opportunity to increase the city’s digital infrastructure. He believes that considerable investment is needed to ensure the Internet faster and rapidly. “Certainly, the availability of free Wi-Fi points in fiber optics expansion and strategic places will change the reality of most families,” says Lucena, how the digital incorporation affects the population positively.
In addition, the use of fiber optic in Brazil and the use of artificial intelligence in Brazil will be indicated as the necessary factors to improve connectivity in the para in the coming years. Lucena suggests that in order to make this modernization effective, infrastructure from the telecommunication industry, finance internet providers and train professionals need to invest.
For Lucena, the Climate Conference infrastructure represents a large step to convert the beleme into a connectivity model for the northern region and Brazil.