How progress is Pope Francis?

Committed poorLos Immigrants and environmenthe Pope Francisco Pontefura has dedicated the most deprived. But was it really progressive? The Argentine Pope, who died on Easter in 88 years, has devoted his first visit to the Italian island Lampedos On July 8, 2013, on that occasion, he praised the dead migrants in the Mediterranean and the effects of “globalization of indifference” before his fate.
Even Ener, Swedish Democratic Democrat He was always talking when people were illuminated When the immigrants were a scapegoat and a devil by the forces that were no less than that in this parliament. “
The “Pope of the Pope” called their actions for the needy people, Invitation to the homeless for dinner in the Vatican And one place World Poor Day. Very interested in economic issues, the holy ink also condemned the “excesses of globalization”, the financial resources that “trample people” and “the new paganism of money“. the ecology He was also at the Pontificate Center, which devoted his seasonal message “Laudato Yes” in 2015.
human rights
In the field of minority rights and slimThe situation has not changed much. While the leader of the Catholic Church opened a blessing Marriage to gay couplesThe door of religious marriage is still closed to them.
Los Sexual and reproductive rights Of women was largely absent from Pontificate. During a visit to Belgium, he described the Pope Abortion doctors to “Mashfaroun” murderers And compare abortion with killing.
“He did not see that the restrictions imposed on the sexual and reproductive rights of women will not end the abortion. It will be made only Abortion “Be dangerous and unknown to all women,” said Lina Gallies, Eurodiputada (S&D). So he was a fight against many inequality, but it seems that this is Gender inequality He adds: “This deficiency in women’s rights was not in their minds.”
Although he suggested Women in the VaticanThey are still Excluded from the priesthood. EURDIPUTADA LINA GáLVEZ does not hesitate to talk about the “missing opportunity”. The question remains: Was it unable, or did you want to fix the church deeply?