The Federal Supreme Court (STF) defines that this Thursday, 10, retired from retired All -life Review Before the court decision to declare an unconstitutional rule No need to return the money.
Unanimously, the ministers defined the amounts insured National Institute of Social Security (INSS) These have received favorable court decisions – whether defined or temporary – not affected until April 5, 2024. Ministers understand that this money is “adapted with good faith”, that is, without the intention of damaging the vault.
On April 5, 2024, the minutes of the STF trial were published for banning lifetime revision. From that moment on, the court’s decision has facial effects.
The Supreme Court has abandoned the retirement of the retirement for paying policy expenses and fees from the winner party, in which case the federal government and its lawyers.
See more
The proposals were submitted by the Minister Tofoli days And welcomed Cassio Nons MarxThe reporter of the case. “We are facing the most hyposafible jurisdiction of them, which is a beneficiary of social security,” said Noon Marose.
The decision was taken from the analysis of the appeal from the National Confederation of Metallurgical Workers (CNTM).
The Supreme Court is known in the legal parlance of its “Modulation of Effects” of its decision, that is, the standards defined at the level of changes and producing the effects. This is a simple device to prevent the conditions of legal insecurity, which has resulted in changes in the interpretation of legal regulations.
What is the entire life revision?
The thesis of the entire life was allowed to be considered in the calculation of pensions in the calculation of social security works before July 1994.
The background was the 1999 Social Security Reform, which was approved by the FHC government, which changed the social security system and excluded the works made before the true plan (1994). There has been an idea of avoiding the effects of uncontrolled inflation since the previous period.
In practice, the decision to include the works before 1994 is only beneficial for those who have received high wages before the real plan.
The STF declares unconstitutional regime and defines that transition rules between social security models are mandatory, and IE insured no longer chooses a new rule, although it is more beneficial. The decision has maintained an estimated impact of R $ 480 billion on public boxes.
