The end of the war against the Sudan military …
Cartoom- Chairman of the Quick Forces Advisory Committee, Hudayiba Abu Nuba surprised the Sudan circles, declared the end of the military war in a traditional form against the Sudan military, and went to a new phase aimed at establishing a “new Sudanese state”.
Last Wednesday, the announcement of Abu Nuba’s announcement at the end of the war on the day of the Sudan military across the state of Cartum was aimed at distracting the continuous failures of “militants”.
But Muhammad Hamdan Dakloo, the commander of the rapid support forces, said that the purpose of Abu Nuba’s speech was that the war ended with the success of the rapid support forces and its progress in all sectors.
Incompetent
Imran said, “The content of Abu Nuba’s Hadith is now showing a modern position like a war and developed countries for our war awareness, and the difference of equality and work is based on efficiency, not sex or color because it was going on in the past.”
He pointed out that he described the Sudan people around the rapid -backed forces, and the alliance of the political and military forces led by the People’s Movement led by Abdel Aziz El Helo and all other militant movements with them was a victory for the wishes of the people, and the dream of building a democratic civilian status.
Imran emphasized that the announcement of Abu Nuba’s announcement does not mean that the end of its traditional form against the military does not mean to retaliate to a rapid support forces.
Abu Nuba’s announcement prompted the different reactions and readings of its significance at this time, as some considered this as a sign of dangerous political and military dimensions.
Talking about the outcome of the traditional war, the military and strategic expert, Brigadier Jamal al -Shahid, claims that the rapid -backed forces have no longer bet on a direct military discount.
This is not a sign of the change in the strategy towards a long -term drainage war, depending on the administrative control, political networking, and unusual strikes, as in Port Sudan, Mary, Adbara and Kosti.
This change comes under the light of increased military pressure, which will emerge rapid support to many areas, including Darpur and North Cordopan, and has the ability to retrieve the initiative in some major axes.
The most dangerous claim of the martyr Brigadier General Nubia, which refers to a transition from the lecture to “reclaiming repression and democracy”, which transforms the concept of partnership in administration to a view of the new state, that is, an attempt to create a parallel power outside the configuration of the state.
It slipped into scenes like Libya or Yemen, where the militants replaced the fighting equipment with parallel legal letters, and tried to impose administrative and political reality on the ground.
The product of failure
Al -Sadiq Adam Omar, the head of the famous anti -information group in Al -Jazeera in Central Sudan, said, “The report of Abu Nuba, Abu Nuba, said that” the attention and distance of the rebels’ militants are trying to change. “
Failures lied to them with a deceptive advertisement that depicts them in control, but after the wars went to their neighbors and villages, the matter was revealed to their supporters, so they worked to mislead the homeland.
Adam Umar reduced any political consequences of rapid support, and that they were not in the arena and that they could not live among citizens after they lived, so how did they participate in the country’s rule.
He explained that the war between the “militants and the citizen” is not the decision of the people and the leadership, and therefore, the citizen will decide on the entry of the militants for political action.
New assumption
A spokesman for rapid support Abu Nuba, a spokesman for the war, and provoking international and regional efforts to renew the immigration path, with a significant change in the balance of the powers they see when the Sudanese army is clearly seen.
Abu Nuba’s speech on the outcome of the military war, Brigadier Jamal -Shahid, was a disguised separatist aim of dragging the parties to overcome the existing power as a premature effort or a disguised separatist aims to impose a new negotiation reality.
He believed that Abu Nuba’s statement refers to a significant development in the political discourse of this power, and opens the door for the possibility of the unity and regional stability of the Sudan government, which suits the declaration of change from the field of struggle in the fighting fields on the legislature.
He explained that this development requires a comprehensive national awareness and that a comprehensive national plan to reduce separatist adventures and foreign interventions requires a clear agreement between military and civil forces. (((Agencies))
