What do STF ministers say to carry out branching action for rebel attempt? Method

Five ministers of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously voted for the rebel attempt to rebel attempt to limit the decision of Federal Deputy Alexandre Ramagam (PL-RJ) to limit the decision of the House. The reporter of the criminal action, Carmen Losia, Louis Fucks, Flevio Dino, Christiano Janin and Alexander de Mores, continued the progress of the claim on the former director of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin) for three crimes.

Court ministers Article 53 of the Constitution, Paragraph 3, Article 53, Paragraph 3, which gives the authority to disrupt the progress of criminal action, maintaining his command.

The reading of the Supreme Ministers is that there is no legislative authority to decide on criminal acts in court, and the allegations against the Department of Actions after their diplomacy can be canceled. According to magistrates, the House does not vote criminal facts before the diploma.

Reporter Alexander de Mores

Minister Alexandre de Mores, a reporter of criminal action on the attempted rebellion, insisted that the resolution passed in the House to suspend action on the branch, as “a very personal character”, as the Federal Supreme Court has already defined.

“There is no doubt about the personal role of the 18/2025 resolution, the Federal Supreme Court, in accordance with the 3rd paragraph of Article 53 of the Federal Constitution, is only about the House of Representatives to analyze the situation of the representatives of the representatives and not in the caridors.

Another requirement of Mores to be highlighted for the resolution of the House is that the criminal offense after the Diploma of the Deputy or Senator, and the possibility of expanding immunity to other defendants such as Jair Bolsonoro (PL).

“The requirements of the most personal character (the only applicable immunity to parliament) and the temporary (crimes after the diploma), are provided in the constitutional text, clearly and expressed, this immunity is in the sense of the improvement of non -parliamentary corrections and criminal offenses before diplomacy.”

Therefore, the constitutional text approved by the National Congress “has only accepted the opportunity to suspend criminal actions on parliament, and after the Diploma, the Supreme Court has also accepted the opportunity to stop the criminal actions on parliament when the Supreme Court complains to the court.

“In the current hypothesis, it is in the current hypothesis, with violence and serious threat, against the inheritance of the union, and with significant loss to the victim (art. 163, the only paragraph, I, III and IV, CP), and listed equity (Art 62, I, Act 9.605/98?

Christiano Janin In addition to the minister’s Christiano Janin reporter vote, the Constitutional Amendment of 2001, 35, is “only criminal measures against the members of Parliament for the crimes committed after the diploma can be suspended.

The minister said that “the consistency, assistants and senators mentioned in the constitutional verse, which is included in its own chapter, should be referred to the crimes after the diploma and during the command.”

The chamber solution on the criminal prosecution of the branch “must adhere to the needs of the constitutional text, thereby producing the effects of parliamentary criminal offenses after its application diplomacy,” Janin believes.

“As exposed, immunity to non -parliamentary or violations before diplomacy is not applicable. Finally, a full suspension of this criminal activity.

Louis fucks Minister Louise Fucks gave a very brief vote and along with Mores.

“In CASU, the defendant’s complaint to the criminal offenses made before and after the Federal Deputy, theoretically, the institutional rights of the House of Representatives to suspend criminal activity, through the literature of the constitutional text, after the Diploma.

Cármen lécia

“There is no constitutional basis for defendants who do not stop parliamentary command or facts before the Congress diplomacy,” said Minister Carmen Losia.

The highlight of the minister is ending the ULATION Hogas that the decision can be expanded to former President Zair Bolsonoro and other respondents.

“Another, more extensive interpretation is emptying one of the basic duties of the law, that is, providing the jurisdiction of the power, because of the extent to the basis of relative immunity and to protect the integrity of the company without the basis of relative immunity and the integrity of the company without the integrity of the company.

Karen believes that Ramagam will respond to the crimes committed before the diploma as a federal deputy.

“The other crimes suggested to him – the armed criminal organization, and the rebel regime should be violently abolished – the general policy must be of common policy, because they are theoretically, before the diploma, not even applicable to other corridors, the immunity provided in the Constitution,”

Flavio Dino

Minister Flavio Dino Mores has warnings. According to the minister, the effects of the resolution should be extended to January 31, 2027, the branch command or a new resolution of the Supreme Court.

“There is no need to talk about the characteristic of the Legislative Assembly to suspend criminal acts in relation to parliamentary crimes before the diplomacy. The reason is obvious: the exercise of the parliamentary command refers to the DISPLIA, which leads to rights and differences. It is intended to create conditions for the exercise of parliamentary activities,” he said.

Another thing that has been highlighted by Dino is that the suspension applies to “a single legislature”. “I have added that Article 53 of the CF, paragraph 3, paragraph 3, applies to the same legislature. In the case of re -election, there is no extension of criminal action. In this situation, there will be another diploma, and crimes leading to suspended criminal activity”.

“Only one state branch in tyranny can pass laws in your hands, explain the budget and directly execute, or to be legally freezing-will freeze everything without law control. Occasionally the majority may be more in a democratic system.”