The week of testimonials of conflicts, wisdom PGR and Broncas rebellion
The Federal Supreme Court (STF) on Wednesday (21) and the Attorney General Office (PGR) ended an investigation into the so -called “Core 1” of the rebel attempt in 2022.
This week’s sessions are identified by contradictory versions of the witnesses, the little angrily acting of the Attorney General Office (PGR) and the Minister Alexandre de Mores will be directed to the deponents and lawyers.
Five testimonials were collected, including the former Army Commanders, Marco Antonio Freer Gomes, and AeronauticsCarlos de Almaida Baptista Junior.
Both are the main responsibility to prevent the rebellion of former President Jair Bolson (PL) and his allies.
However, Fry Gomes presented a light version of these events, in contrast to the Federal Police and the Baptista Jonier’s evidence.
During a hearing on Wednesday (21), Lieutenant Baptista reiterated that Junior reiterated, and threatened to arrest Jair Bolsonoro (PL) if the former president tried to rebel after the defeat in the 2022 elections.
“General Freer Gomes studied and did not speak aggressively with the president, but it was the same. Calm and calm: ‘If you try it, I have to arrest you,” said Baptista Jr..
Freer Gomes rejected the episode on Monday (19): “Some vehicles have reported that I will give a former presidential jail sentence, but it has not happened,” he said.
There is also a difference in the reports of the character of Former Navy Commander, Almir Garnier.
According to Baptista Jr., Garnier made the forces available to Garnier Bolsonaro, supporting the inauguration of the President -ENC Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva (PT).
On the other hand, Fry Gomes has reduced the gesture and denies commenting as a combination, however, in the pre -statement to the Federal Police, in the opposite direction.
Depending on the contradictory versions, the Attorney General’s Office adopts a wise attitude, without questions about the differences in the reports.
However, this difference was angered by Alexander de Mores, who had been in the Freer Gomes. “Either you have the truth in the federal police, or the truth is being misled here,” said Mores General’s clarity and accuracy.
Freer Gomes, of course, made himself available to the President himself, but it could be just a gesture of respect, and that he could not say what the true intentions of Admiral were.
Two commanders confirmed to the Supreme Court that there were meetings between military and government members, with Zaire Bolsonoro’s involvement in the partnership of the former president-what could be done to avoid Lula.
However, Baptista reported that Junior conferences were pronounced as a rebellion, saying that the documents submitted by Freer Gomes were “studies” and said everything was in the constitution.
Freer Gomes said he had studies from Bolsono and cited the opportunity to decree the documents Guarantee of law and order (GLO) Or a state of defense.
The former commander army has reported that the former president has warned that Bolsonoro should be careful not to adopt an unconstitutional act.
Junior BaptistIn turn, he mentioned that he witnessed metings in which the terms of the terms of the so -called “draft coup” were discussed, which worked in a “brainstorm” scheme, that is, a survey of ideas. In one of these meetings, the arrest of Minister Alexandre de Mores was also considered
Other witnesses have confirmed the unusual and twisted requests from the Federal Highway Police (PRF) leadership about “blitz” activities on election day.
Former Intelligence Analysis of the Federal Highway Police (PRF), Adil Pereira Alkantara, told the Supreme Court that PRF’s Operations Director Goyice, Sao Paulo, Minus Garies and Rio de Janero have been supported by the buses and vans of Rio de Janero. The director would tell him that “the time to take a PRF side” at the behest of the then Director General Silveni Vascus.
Intelligence analyst of the Ministry of Justice General Intelligence Coordination, Klebson Ferrera, asked whether the PRF believed that the PRF had acted differently in the most supported areas of Ferrera de Paula Viera, Lula or Bolsonoro. Clubson replied “completely”.
Anderson Torres
During the trial, all lawyers may question witnesses. Depending on the opportunity, the defense of former minister Anderson Torres tried to dismiss the defendant from the scamer’s pronunciation and starred in another moment that would irritate Mores.
In evidence, the draft scam submitted to him at Freer Gomes’ meetings was similar to a document that appeared at home.
The former minister insisted on questioning whether the lawyer documents were identical and if Freer Gomes was sure what he was talking about.
Repeated Minister Alexander de Mores intervened: “The Lord has already asked the same thing four times and the answer of the deponant is clear.”
Then he said, “I will not allow your landlord to circle your landlord in my court. If you are trying to inspire the witness, I will have to cut your word.”
On the other hand, Anderson questioned the defense witnesses about contact with Torres. Everyone said that he had nothing to do with the former minister and that he had condemned the orders from him, or that he had seen him participating in rebel content meetings.
Baptista Junior said he was also corrected to the Federal Police and said he did not know whether he had attended the draft meeting.
