The STF rebates the economist, which supports Mores and there is no confidence crisis in court | Method
On Saturday, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) criticized the article of the Economist Magazine, Minister Alexander de Mores said that he had “high powers” and faced the court “growing questions”. In a note signed by the court president, Minister Louis Roberto Baroso, the Supreme Court upheld the performance of Moyes and denies that there is no confidence crisis in the company.
“Focusing on the story will be more adapted to the story of those who have tried to rebel, and that Brazil has full democracy, law, brakes and counter waits and fundamental rights,” the court said.
The English magazine said that the Supreme Court could intensify its confidence crisis against Brazilian in the first class of the court, in the first class of the court. This text also criticized the ministers Gilmar Mendis and Dias Tofoli and pointed out that Mores had “high powers” in court decisions.
In response, the Supreme Court said that the trial of criminal action was followed in criminal proceedings, and that these cases were analyzed by the classes, not by the plenary. “It is unusual to change it,” said Borso’s signed note.
Barrasso has resisted the suggestion that Mores should be suspended from the Bolsono inquiry. According to him, all the former president’s Supreme members were demeaned and “if the alleged enmity of him is the standard of suspicion, it is enough to avoid attacking the court.” He classified Mores as a judge, “He adapts to commitment and dares his character, with court support, not personally.”
The Supreme Court has denied the confidence crisis in the company and cites data released in March 2024 in support of this argument. However, in mentioning data, the Baroso used the percentage of the judicial system, compared to the court, 24% of people who trust 24%, 44% do not trust a little, and 30% do not trust.
According to the survey, 21% of the respondents believe in the Supreme Court, 44% a little trust and 30% do not believe. For the court, it shows that most of the population has some level of confidence in the court.
The note believes that other ministers have been approved after the monocratic decisions cited by the magazine. Among them, the suspension of X (former Twitter), which is determined by the lack of a legal representative in Brazil, not by some content published in the platform. The measurement was reversed after the reference of the representative.
“All content removal decisions are properly triggered and there are preparations for crime, crime or rebellion. The court has defeated the court ‘Bolsonoro (lost). This is the STF.
Although this report quoted the “certain threats of democracy” in the country, on January 8, the attacks failed to mention the attempts of three powers in Bracelia in the attacks on January 8, along with the bomb explosion at the STF and the capital airport. The note also stated that President Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva and Vice President Geraldo Alkmin (PSB), as well as Minister Alexander de Mores murder.
“It is an independent and active court that requires an independent and active court to prevent the collapse of companies from Eastern Europe to Latin America.
