The government has concluded the proposal to control large techs focused on transparency for customers | Method

The Lula government has completed the expansion of two bills to control digital platforms. The texts were contacted at the end of April, and now the ministers who participated in the party should find themselves to discuss the best political moment to send them to Congress.

One of these projects is built by the Secretariat of Digital Rights (Sedigi), the Ministry of Justice (MJSP), and the other, by the Secretariat of Economic Reforms (SRE) in the Ministry of Finance. Both are in the final adjustments in an interference in the civil house.

Sedigi’s proposal is a kind of consumer protection code for users on the Internet. According to the digital service offered by the text, it proposes to reduce measures and varies more to the consumer law than the punishment for platforms. For example, the goal is to give users more transparency to social networks and recognition of use and advertising.

Companies need to use active actions to eliminate serious offenses such as child sexual exploitation, terrorism and suicide and self -self -esteem, especially children and adolescents. Companies have hypothesis that companies have to delete publications from the air through illegal notification such as misleading or abusive statements.

The concern of Sedigi is that the proposal of a different logic from the 2630/2020 project is called a fake news PL, which was buried in April last year after losing political feasibility, so that the Lula administration does not seem to refund the same text. Focus on the protection of children and adolescents, Secretary of the Secretary Lillion Sintra D Mello has influenced the expansion of the new proposal – and helps in finding a consensus with pocket opposition, even friendly to the theme.

According to the report of the Digital Service Suppliers, the SAC (Customer Service) Company, Complaints Channel, Terms of Use, Dark Peter (Digital Interface Design Mechanisms), Automated Account Identification, Data Protection and Transparency, according to the report of the Digital Service Suppliers, provided by Sedigi’s proposal.

There is also an indication of advertising repositories, child sexual harassment and exploitation and other serious crimes, systemic risk assessment, crisis protocol and transparency reports. A section is in the draft for children and adolescents guarantee.

Digital platforms have the idea of ​​just intermediate. The government understands that the companies are suppliers and are responsible for not reducing the risks caused by their digital services. The designers said they put the same logic of the consumer protection code and the same logic of the child and adolescent inscription. “

The project, designed by the farm, is targeting the market for social networking platforms and dealing with economic and competitive aspects. The text expands all the power of the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) to investigate and define new responsibilities for companies. For example, the idea of ​​providing services, advertising or searches and other forms of authority is to deal with any monopoly.

According to the text in the discussion, the market power, relevant personal and commercial data, revenues and a significant number of consumers have to frame the companies in the “systemically related” category, according to the text in the discussion.

Agriculture is understood that countries around the world have been successful in creating the jurisdiction of the law and the need for changes of competitive law, as well as receiving pro -competitive control tools. One of the models considered as a reference is the European Digital Markets Act (DMA).

Like Estado It showed, with the largest stalemate control range in the working group in the civil house. While the court has proposed to reach all digital service suppliers who have streaming and marketplace platforms, delivery applications and fintech, they want to limit the agricultural limit. The estimate is that more pronunciation and conversations are needed to accept the project for a wide control, which can disassociate it.

There are still things to be debated from project processing in Congress. One is about the competent authority to control platforms. The Government Wing argues that the National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is responsible for this, while another prefers the National Telecommunications Agency (Anatel).

A meeting between ministers should be held on Wednesday, but the postponement of the projects to discuss the further steps of the projects. It is expected to be re -scheduled in the coming days. Governors believe that the executive is only six months to accept projects to accept projects, as it is usually a revenge when the actions of the eve in the election year are not in the election year.