Scammer Laws: PGR | Method
The Federal Supreme Court (STF) denies 31 people involved in January 8 in undemocratic actions. These inquiries took place in the virtual sessions of the court plenary between May 12 and 30. For 28 respondents, penalties were determined in a year’s detention, which were replaced by right limits. For the remaining three, the penalty was two years and five months detention.
In all criminal acts, the reporter’s vote, Minister Alexander de Mores, said that the respondents were part of a group with the intention of overthrowing a democratically elected government in 2022, as the Attorney General’s Office (PGR) pointed out that it was a collective author.
In addition to other aspects, these measures are not effective in order to comprehend the rebellion and the protections say that the accused only intended to participate in a peaceful show. They also deny the presence of crimes of mass writer.
However, according to the reporter, the PGR shows that the materials released on social networks are “the intention of preventing the exercise of powers and power.” The prosecution argues that with the tasks defined by this group, it is responsible for being responsible for being in the rebel camp, and to encourage others to commit crimes.
See more
In addition, this group is to inspire enmity between the armed forces and the Republican forces, which configures the crimes of the Criminal Association and stimulate the guilt.
Refusing to Agreement is to avoid confidence
According to the Supreme Court, although 31 people were punished for less serious crimes, they rejected the PGR proposed penalty non -Penal (ANPP) agreement, which prevents the continuation of criminal activity.
In addition to a one -year compulsory fine replaced by rights restrictions, they must pay ten minimum wage fines to inspire the crime, as they encouraged to take over the armed forces due to the cause of election fraud.
Some defendants have received big fines – two years and five months, in the early rule of the semi -Open – to break the precautionary measures imposed in the past, such as attendance and the use of electronic ankles.
All convicts have to pay compensation in the amount of R $ 5 million to divide with others who have committed the same crimes.
Even with the replacement of restrictive punishment, the participants are no longer the primary respondents when appeals and the Decision Res Judicata are not more likely. Minister Alexander de Mores insisted that in the same situation, more than 500 people have chosen to admit crime and sign an agreement.
