Projects on January 8 Divide opinions on the Parayens bench | Method

In the National Congress, the two proposals are creating different reactions on the parliamentary bench. First, Senate President David Alcombrre (Brazil-AP Union), 8 January 8 January 2023 aims to reduce the penalties of laws

The theme mobilizes members of the various ideological currents. But what do Para representatives think of these proposals?

In the wake of the two projects, the Liberal Congress has heard members of the Liberal Congress to understand how each is kept.

Proposals divide opinions

The existence of federal deputy Dilwanda Pharaoh (PT) is considered to be part of the Democratic game. “In democratic regime, it justifies its place on each side, and it is natural,” he said. According to her, it is important to be protected by the criminals with righteousness and respect.

For Dilwanda, the judgment of each case should be considered the personality of the actions committed. “I am protecting the flexibility according to the content of the actions. Everything should be judged according to what they have done,” he said.

Commenting on the Para bench, she agreed that there are internal departments. “Certainly, the theme divides. Every parliament member protects his world’s view and his ideology.” However, she looks at the room to understand: “I believe the civilized conversation is always the best way.”

Federal Deputy Deputy Jokwim Pastinho (PL) has been criticized for its most consideration of the fines applicable to those involved in the actions on January 8. “I will not agree with the 17 -year sentence. It seems exaggerated to me. Or ordinary criminals get such confidence,” he said.

He supported the two proposals in the discussion, but with the exceptions. “I agree with two lessons, though you think they still need improvements,” he said. For Pasinho, the Senate proposal expands the debate on this issue. “This project does not evacuate debt debt. He will enrich him,” he said.

The Federal Deputy Eder Mouro (PL) did not respond to the report of the report, but expressed himself on social networks. In a video published after participating in the April 4 exhibition in Sao Paulo in support of former President Zair Bolsonoro, he defended the debt waiver for the attackers. “I am on the Paulista Avenue on Sunday. I must be in a peaceful demonstration encouraged by Brazilians, yes, we must make a loan to those who are unjustly arrested.”

According to him, many accused did not refer to the real threat. “Why an elderly woman who is being treated as a president, Ice cream, popcorn, popcorn, terrorists? They have a popcorn bag, ice cream, lipstick and Bible bag. It’s irreplaceable.

Federal Deputy Airton Falero (PT) has also sought the report, spoken through video on social networks. He claimed that the debt waiver was contrary to the proposal and highlighted the intensity of the actions. “They are not a protective ladies here and there with Batonzinho. This is an architectful act to attack three forces and try to scam in democracy.”

Falero is more visible in criticizing this initiative. “We are talking about who is planning a presidential murder, vice president and the Supreme Minister who plans the murder.

See more

What do projects estimate

David Alcombray’s project proposes to reduce the penalty of two -thirds to those who have been involved in the actions of January 8, separating the protesters from the leaders and pronunctions of the leaders of the three -powers in Brazilia. This proposal also refers to the integration of crimes such as the effort of rebellion and the abolition of democratic rule, allowing them to be considered a previous crime. This prevents the accumulation of penalties and, as a result, reduces prison time.

The House’s proposal to participate in the political and election exhibitions between the end of the 2022 and the implementation of the new law is dealing with a wide -ranging loan waiver. The defenders of the measurement claim that the goal is to ensure the freedom of manifestation. On the other hand, critics have argued that the debt waiver can open a room for the punishment of actions that are considered scammers.