Political scientist says STF is not dotted through home | Method
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) scholar for over 30 years, Law Professor and political scientist Oscar Wilhena is unlikely to develop an attack of the House of Representatives to stop the rebel act.
“This extension of the supreme Estado.
Based on the constitutional rule that authorized the House and the Senate to stop the progress of criminal actions against the members of Parliament, the decision was given to the decision of the Legislature’s plenary.
Deputy Alexander Ramagam (PL-RJ) has approved the suspension of the House in an attempt to benefit other goals of the process, including former President Jair Bolsonoro (PL).
However, this rule is only valid for the tragedies after the diplomacy. The Supreme Court is based on this reference to follow the process after the House officially announced.
The author of the “Supremocracy” – the author of the Supreme Court with other powers – is of the view that the court does not accept the comment of the House of Representatives of the Oscar Wilhena.
“There is no chance,” he said. “Supreme, in addition to going to the announcement of his jurisdiction over the house, it is always worried about not being drops.”
The teacher recognizes two impulses for the decision of the House of Representatives. The first was the opportunity to benefit former President Zair Bolsonoro during the medium. The second is an attempt to create an ancestor that benefits other parliamentarians who are threatened by surveys and convictions.
“The Brazilian parliament is clear what their corporate interests are, what are the threats from the outside, including the threats from the app of the Supreme Court Act. They have seen them as a measure that can protect them. I think this is just a corporate defense act.”
Wilhena says ministers will now assess the purpose of the resolution passed in the House.
“The Congress has given a card. The fact is that it is a Supreme Court to see the application of the law. I think this is a very discussion within the Supreme. What is the purpose of the House, this movement and its evolution.”
