Mores Mota reports the action against the decision to justify the rebel process | Method
Federal Supreme Court (STF) Minister Alexander de Mores Deputy Alexandre Ramagam (PL-RJ), former President Zair Bolson (PL) and other leaders of the rebellion plan will report the action of the House of Representatives.
The process was distributed to the minister’s office to prevention based on the rules of internal regulations on Thursday 15, “distributed to the same reporter for precautionary measure and the main process or appeal”.
Since Mores is a reporter for the trial of the rebellion and the criminal actions from him, the appeal of the Chamber of Deputies has been sent to the minister’s collection.
Mayor, Hugo Mota (Republican-PB) filed a lawsuit on Tuesday, 13, on Tuesday, 13, and said that the Supreme Court’s first-grade decision violated the principle of separating the powers and parliamentary immunity.
“By partially blocking the constitutional attribution of the House of Representatives, the decision of the decision of the argument does not properly undertake the performance of political-parliamentary control, distorting the organizational design described by the Constitution,” he said.
The decision was “the role of the legislative authority in having any abuse in exercising criminal prosecution over its members,” the House of Representatives said.
Hugo Mota argues that defining the “extension” of stopping actions in every specific case is on the legislature.
“The consistency provided in the Constitution is not a shield of punishment, but a device that protects the free exercise of the command, whose legitimacy requires a popular sovereignty and balance between the forces of the Republic.”
The Constitution has authorized the House and the Senates to stop the progress of criminal acts against the members of Parliament, which has given the decision of the Legislature’s plenary.
Since one of the branch defendants, in an attempt to benefit other goals of this process, including the former president, the House approved the action of the rebellion, but the Supreme Court’s first class of the Supreme Court was “very personal”, that is, the exercise of the command only
Ministers reiterated that this rule only applies to crimes after diplomacy. Therefore, they continued the process, causing the branch diplomacy to cause crimes.
The deputy has two crimes in the process, followed by diplomacy – a decline in qualified loss and listed assets. These are crimes of vandalism of January 8, 2023. In relation to them, the Supreme Court has stopped the process until the end of the mandate.
The deputy also responds to three other offenses of violently trying to abolish the rebellion and democratic state – the allegations of the rebel plan. These are usually continued.
