Justice of SP Debate | Method

The Sao Palo Court, Tuesday, 20, Tuesday, TV presenter Jose Louis Datena has rejected a claim for compensation for moral losses filed against Marcel (PRTB). During the campaign for the city of Sao Paulo, the influencer suggested that the journalist could be rapist. The decision still allows appeal. Detena did not speak.

“There is a man with Jack here, and here is a wave, supporting the censorship, but a person responsible for sexual harassment, and this person ‘pity’, (in reference to Detena). TV cursuraIn September last year.

Datena has filed a case against Marina for using the expression of “Jack”, which is a slang used in the prison system to hire prison in prison system. The influencer claimed that Datena had been accused of harassment and publicly questioned the physical relationship with the victim. At that time, the comment led to physical aggression as a result: Datena hit a wheel at the martial center.

Judge Alexander Rosin, the 14th Civil Court of Sao Palo, said that Marinna was not blamed directly from rape and only mentioned the theme during the election debate.

Rosin argues “This period is not mentioned as the author Rapist, especially the direct problem, especially the harassment and harassment of the general public and the difference between rape, violent attack, fraud, obscene law, etc., according to common sense.”

Detena requested 000 100,000 compensation, and Marcel’s comments claimed that she had set up an attack on her honor. In his defense, the PRTB candidate said that his statements were limited to freedom of expression. Marcel’s protection also claimed that the matter was in the public interest, especially when it was the electoral process.

For the judge, Marcel asked, the allegations of harassment, the allegations of harassment were not dangerous in the event of the question: “In the case of the third party parts, there is no dangerous ability to question the question.

As shown Estado checksActual facts EstadoThere are allegations of sexual harassment on Datena, not rape. The Marcel cited episode is related to the claim filed in 2019, in which former Brazilian band Rapor Bruna Drous has sexually abused. Datena said in interviews that he had masturbated him thinking about him. He also says that it is “waste”, that she is in contact with another woman and that she “does not know the right person.”

On the other hand, Marcel filed a claim on the presenter in September 2024, demanding the same $ 100,000, this time for the attack with the chair.

In the initial petition of the process, it Estado He has access to the Marcel’s legal group as a “attack on freedom of expression and the right to democratic partnership.” In the document, Due to the consequence of reaching the episode, Marcel suffered “trouble and public shame”, as well as physical damage.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button