House asks the Supreme Court for more time to apply the decision to cancel the deputies election | Method

The House of Representatives asked the Federal Supreme Court (STF) The officialization of a decision to lead to the cancellation of the election of seven parliamentarians Until the processes are completed. According to the House, this problem requires “comprehensive analysis”, as it can create changes in parliamentary composition, which directly affects the performance of the legislature.

“There is a risk of taking over the parliamentary representation, the House of Representatives said in the request that the House of Representatives and the loss of direct impact on the organization, the lack of comprehensive analysis, the lack of comprehensive analysis, the wisdom and proportion”.

The room is based on Law No. 9,868/999, which regulates the actions of direct constitutional (ADI) and highlights the difference between precautionary measures, which have an immediate effect, as they deal with emergency and merit decisions, which can only have effects after the final judgment and judgment. The house argues that the decision to change the composition of the home is not yet implemented, as it is not final, it compromises legal certainty.

See more

Last Thursday, 16, the Supreme Court in 2022 was due to the application of regulations on the distribution of seven auxiliary provisions of electoral remuneration items that were considered unconstitutional. Members of the affected parliament: Sylvia VP (PL-AP), Soniz Barbosa (PL-AP), Professor Goreth (PDT-AP), Augusto Pappo (MDB-AP), Gilvan Maximo (Republican-DF), Labron (UNO) and Lazarus Botelho).

Although the decision is in immediate implementation, its implementation depends on the election and the House. PSB, PCDOB, and parties that can benefit from measurement, can emphasize the immediate implementation of the decision, as their benches get new chairs.

With this change, parliamentarians who have to take over the orders: Professor Marcivonia (Picidob-AP), Paulo Lemos (PSOL-AP), Andrigo Abdon (PP-AP), Rodrigo Rollberg (PSB-DF), Rafael Bento (Somos-DRO), Tiago (Somos).

In February 2024, the Supreme Court considers the Congress’s change in 2021 to be unconstitutional, which was applied to the 2022 claim, then it had to decide whether its decision would only be valid from 2024. With the decision for retroactivity, the 2022 election results were affected, leading to the position of elected assistants based on the norm, which is invalid.

Therefore, the vacancies are distributed in accordance with the standards before the change of 2021, the parties have to reach at least 80% of the electoral quotes, and the candidates have to run at least 20% of that indicator.