Hugo Mota says that the decision to prevent action against Ramage has a ‘wide will’ | Method
Chamber of Deputies President Hugo Mota (Republican-PB) said that the decision to lock criminal acts on Federal Deputy Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ) is “widespread desire for the House”. He said he hopes to make a home legal advice to determine the next steps.
“It is important to say that it is a support of more than 300 aides, that is, the widespread will of the house is expressed by locking criminal action,” Mota said in the 12th, New York (USA).
This is the first advertisement of the Supreme Federal Court after the Supreme Federal Court (STF) canceled the initiative of the Supreme Federal Court (STF )’s first -class deputy and Brazilian intelligence agency (Abin) former director, former President Jair Bolsono (PL).
On May 7, the House approved a project to suspend criminal measures against branching for stroke effort in the Supreme Court. The action was supported from 315 aides, 143 voted and four stopped.
“We have a legal advice of the House to study this to see what the house looks like,” he said CNN Brazil When participating in the Effira Dialogs event in New York, when asked about the next steps.
Remember the case
Federal deputy Alexandre Ramagam, along with other allegations, responded to the Supreme Court’s claim for a rebellion. The complaint of the PGR, which accepted the Supreme Court, was headed to the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin), helping Ramagem Bolsonoro to inspire the rebellion platform, and he ended up trying to take power in electronic ballot boxes and opponents. He was in office until March 2022, unziped to apply for home. He denies the allegations.
The appeal, which was submitted by the PL, depends on the expansion of the Constitution, which gives the authority to contribute to the progress of the criminal action, but continues his mandate. On December 19, 2022, the party said it had committed all the crimes accused of committing the branches after his diploma.
This title was used as an example of scammer actions of January 8.
On Saturday, 10, the Supreme Court’s first class House limited the decision and decided to respond to the branch to respond to three crimes: tried to abolish democratic rule violently; Tried rebellion; And a criminal organization. The court defined that the resolution of the house cannot be covered by other defendants.
