“Signal event” amidst security consequences and political interactions …
The echo of “signal chat” is still hesitant in the Washington corridors, after announcing the closure of the White House file, new reports have been issued on more mutual messages through the application and using private email in sensitive correspondence. The Pentagon General Investigator (The Pentagon) has announced this week, as the US Defense Minister has begun an investigation into the use of Beat and partnership of sensitive information; Led to growing calls for his resignation or dismissal. In addition to other invitations to dismiss the national security adviser Mike Walz.
Washington Report “Washington Report” program “Signal” event is reviewing the consequences of the “Signal” event, and US President Donald Trump continue to protect his team from the opponents of the event? It also appears in the mechanism used to discuss sensitive matters such as military attacks and the actions taken by the White House to prevent repetition of such events.
A security violation
Adam Clemens, Foreign Policy for Qatar and Kuwait at the US Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Kuwait and Yemen’s Joint Chiefs, former military adviser to Saudi Arabia and Jordan, expresses his surprise to the US officers on the “Segal” application Task.
The method of dealing with this problem is inappropriate: “When the White House declared that he would see the protocol that led to what was happening, it seems that such a thing had happened. There were existing systems and laws, and they were not clear.”
As a result, the Ministry of Justice, National Security Council, Foreign Affairs Ministry and former Officer Chris Pinter to counter cyber piracy at the Federal Investigation Office, “The actual violation of the protocol is” the actual violation of the protocol. He believes that the “signal” platform is safe and coded, although the “signal” platform is safe and coded, the pinter says that the accurate and delicate information, Take, etc., which contains the details of the attacks on the attacks; Because it is not encrypted.
The “Sagenal” incident has provoked criticism from democratic and Republican parties, and former US Defense Intelligence Officer Michael Brigen said: “I voted for Trump and supported the attacks against Houts, but I could criticize the Higseth.
Brigate said the speech on the “Segenal” stage lasted three days, saying that if the task is against a strong enemy and the Houti has more capabilities than what is experienced, there will be American victims today. I have insulted it because «Higseth was talking to us as viewers in the Morning Fox and Friends Program.
Recognized official protocols
Many were surprised by the lack of employment of official protocols approved in sensitive military activities with senior officials of the group who exchanged messages on the platform. The pinter spoke about this, saying that the US government spends ten lakhs of dollars for safe facilities to communicate on the privacy of many levels, and these facilities are in the offices of each minister’s office and chat, and many of these officers have the same facilities in their home.
Is it easy to use “” Segal “application? No, but there is a reason for it, because it is very safe, usually in such a case, the authorities meet in the operating room. But there are other facilities they can meet and safe.
Clemens claims that the US government is using “signal” application and other secure applications to coordinate general or administrative work in American embassies abroad or in Washington, but if it is not secret, it will rely on a certain level of sensitivity associated with US foreign policy goals. He explains: «When strategic, friendly and subsidiary countries share information with the US, the United States and other countries hope that this information will be followed by international agreements. This is another example of the United States that do not adhere to these functions and controls, and it is harmful. ”
When it comes to Breezet, who has worked with American Intelligence Agencies, he is talking about his practical experience in the framework of sensitive discussions, saying that these agencies have not used “signal” or “WhatsApp” platforms, but by the phones issued by the government, they are briefly communicating through them. Brigen saw the lack of experience of US officers and participated in the incident. “They are not experienced military officers, but today they are in high positions and in Pentagon and National Intelligence, and they should be an example of everyone who works according to their command.”
Who is responsible for?
Since he is involved in sensitive military information, the US Defense Secretary has been criticized for his role in chatting; What is the reason for the launch of internal research in this regard. The reason for the lack of actual accountability here is of the deep partisan sections of the breset; Leading in the absence of credibility accents. It gives an example of the withdrawal of Afghanistan and the failure of the Biden administration, as he says, indicates that the Democrats are not in accountability and accountability demanding. Brigate promised to resign as a resignation officer as a result of this security violation.
Clemens suggested in the light of new developments about the conversations in private email and other “Segal” chats, despite the announcement of the closure of the White House file. He said: “President Trump is likely to reopen the case, but it is clear that he does not want to boycott the authorities at this early stage of his administration to avoid transferring from one officer to another.”
The Pinter stated that the “Sagenal” incident is not a bias: “Unfortunately, we have reached a stage in Washington, we can never recognize guilt or error. When it comes to Trump, it is weak to recognize anything wrong, but it is a success.