American ambassador visits Israel to discuss the situation in Syria
Grusi: Syria agrees to enter into inspectors for suspected previous nuclear sites
The United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grassy told the Associated Press today that Syria had agreed to enter the inspectors immediately to the previous nuclear sites.
Grusi’s comments came in an exclusive interview in Damascus, where he met with Syrian President Ahmed Al -Shahara and many other officials.
Grussia explained that Sharia’s president was interested in maintaining nuclear energy development in Syria in the future: “Why not?”
The agency’s goal is to “provide full clarity on certain activities in the past, according to the agency’s evaluation, may be tied to nuclear weapons,” Grusi said.
Grussia described the new Syria government as “publicly committed to the world and international cooperation” and that he hopes to complete the inspection in months.
It is believed that Syria was widely organized by former Syrian president Bashar al -Asad, in which North Korea had an unannounced nuclear reactor built by the Governorate of East Syria in East Syria.
The International Atomic Energy Agency described the reactor as “not designed to generate electricity”, which increased the concern that Damascus was trying to develop nuclear weapons through the production of plutonium, which was equal to the level of weapons.
After the launch of the only nuclear power in the Israeli Middle East, the location of the reactor was only popular to the public’s opinion, leading to the destruction of the reactor as a result of air strikes in 2007.
Later, Syria did not completely demolish this site and did not answer the IAEA questions.
Grusi said the inspectors were expected to return to the reactor in Deer Al -Jour, along with three other sites connected to him.
Other sites subjected to the control of the international nuclear energy agency have a small reactor of the Neutron sources in Damascus and a comfort of the yellow uranium cake.
“We are trying to reduce the range of focus on those sites or on the sites that are true importance,” Grassy added.
Although there are no indications of radiation leaks from these sites, the agency is concerned about “the possibility of enriched uranium somewhere and re -using it, illegally transporting or trading.”
