STF again will judge user content responsibility for large tech
The plenary of Supreme Federal Court (STF) Returned on Wednesday (4) of Article 19’s constitutionalism Marco Civil Da Internet. Ministers discuss whether large techs are responsible for the criminal content posted on their platforms.
Article 19 of the current Internet Civil Marco has defined the court order to exclude content for internet providers, websites and social networking managers as a cause of damage caused by illegal posts published by third parties.
The decision to make ministers has common consequences (theme 987) and the extraordinary appeal (RE) occurs in the 1037396 range, reported by Minister Dias Tofoli. In the current case, Facebook has questioned the decision of the Sao Paulo Court of Justice (TJSP), which has decided to exclude the false profile on the social network.
In another appeal (Re 1057258), Minister Luiz Fucks, Google, has reportedly tried to reverse the decision decided by the Minus Garies Court of Justice (TJMG) to pay moral compensation for not excluding the Occut society created to demean a person. Under both circumstances, the reporters deny the provision of resources.
Two ministers – Dias Tofoli and Louis Fucks – Have already voted to extend the hypothes of liability of platforms.
The final debate on the matter was held on December 18 last year. At the trial, Supreme Court President Lose Roberto Barrouso, voted against the filing of appeals and submitted three hypothes: removing court orders, removing illegal notification and the general function of care.
The trial was paused after the request for Minister Andre Mendonia’s view.
This week, Minister Gilmar Mendis talked about the inquiry and said the result was “at least a sketch of social media control.
At a news meeting yesterday, President Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva (PT) also pointed out on the control of networks. “We need to do a control as soon as possible, through the Congress or the Supreme Court, because on January 8, a person cannot try to rebel and it is not possible to say that it is freedom of expression. You know this country’s falseary factory.”
In a statement on the trial, Google states that “the abolition of civil liability separation of civil liability from consumers does not contribute to the end of unwanted content on the Internet.”
“The Internet can improve and improve and improve, improve, legal uncertainty and discretionary content have been established by policy guarantees and standards to prevent elimination. Google will eliminate the rules of its platforms, violating the rules of each platforms. According to the public rules of each product, he has been removed.
