Bowlos | Method

The Electoral Court of Sao Paulo has ordered the cancellation of the order and during the campaign for the city of Sao Paulo in 2024, the eight -year -old councilman declared unnecessary for Rubinho Noon’s (Union), a false medical report published by Pablo Maral (PRTB) (PRTB). The decision was issued on Friday, 30th, Friday and it was appealed.

The content was released on Rubinho’s Instagram during the first round of election. This report, then proved to be false by expertise, has a positive outcome for Bowlose cocaine.

For Journal Antonio Maria Patino Jourz from Sao Paulo’s 1st Election Zone, this publication responsible for the sentence represented the serious violation of the electoral law: In addition to configuring a negative propaganda based on a popular fact, a candidate, especially a candidate, has nothing to do with the necessary solitude.

The action was filed by Leonardo Dose Reis Adorno Becker in 2024 by the Councilman candidate PSOL-Read Federation. Rubinho has worked with Marcel to spread false information for election purposes, using a famous document that can attack Bouloss honor and interrupt the balance of conflict.

Rubinho’s protection, the report claimed that the report was shared by mistake and that he had been removed immediately after doubts about his authenticity were removed, and only 26 minutes were in the air. Prosecutors believed that the publication had an irrelevant impact on the election outcome as Bulos reached the second round, and that there was no abuse, but a legitimate strategy of political conflict on social networks. In the second round, they claimed that Ballos was directly involved with Marcial and that the episode was “no hurt” – according to Defense, it shows that the case can already be overcome.

However, the judge rejected the arguments, although this post was broadcast for a few minutes, with likes of more than 3,000 people, the range was expressive, and the use of a fake document extended the limits of political criticism, affecting the integrity of the election. In the previous election, the publication was made at the sensitive time of the campaign and contributed to the visibility of Rubinho’s election, which increased his vote three times compared to 2020.

“The use of social network is not allowed to penetrate the unrealistic information known to the opposing candidate’s false report with the intention of gaining election visibility,” the Magistrate wrote.

In punishment, the judge is not intended to protect the personal dignity of the election judicial Investigation Action (IJ) candidates, but to guarantee the stability of the democratic process, the behavior of Rubinho is not intended to classify the widespread poem of classifying as part of a systematic operation.

In addition to withdrawing the orders, the magistrate’s parliamentarian was disqualified for eight years. “Ij is the goal of protecting the legal good from the mass ownership, that is, the stability of democratic rule is expressed with the sovereignty of the popular vote,” depending on the severity of the situation, there is no need to prove that the end result of the episode has changed.

The decision was first issued and still appealed to the regional election court of Sao Palo and later, to a high electoral court.