R $ 1 million has entered into account ‘without clear inspiration’, PF | Method

Financial movements by family members, unprecedented real estate transactions and credit card expenditure suddenly, Judge Ivan Lacio Amert, from Vila Rica County, from Vila Ric County in Mato Graso, the aim of the new phase of operation Sissamness, Thursday, Federal Police. According to the investigation, Amarent’s privacy has been violated by the fact that by 2023, the judge’s account had fallen by $ 1 million in the account.

Inquiry is focused on the suspicion of decisions in the Moto Graso Court and the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) ministers’ offices.

Until this text was published, the Moto Graso Court had asked the judge’s report through the Press Office, but there was no benefit. The National Council of Justice (CNJ) denied a relationship with the corruption scheme and that there was no evidence that he had bribed.

The judge was removed from October 2024 on the orders of the CNJ. On Tuesday, 27, after the National Corredge of Justice vote, Minister Mauro Campbell – began the disciplinary administration about Amarent’s behavior. This policy may lead to the precise removal of the judge by mandatory retirement – this is a measure provided in the organic law of the judiciary, which guarantees that the accused is proportional to the time of career.

Federal Supreme Court Minister Cristiano Janin has also decided to remove the Vila Rica judge under Operation Sissamness and Phase 8. Janin’s decision follows the investigation encouraged by the Curregector Campbell.

According to Sissamness and Persian mythology, a corrupt judge of bribery.

By removing the judge, the National Council of Justice suggested suspicions on financial and real estate transactions.

According to CNJ Kororegia, the “significant part of the” inaccurate purpose received by the Magistrate “was used to buy at least one apartments in the land and in Kuaba.

According to Operation Sissamness, real estate is no longer “declared” on income tax.

Researchers believe that hiding is “repeatedly practiced” and that money does not leave magistrate’s accounts for real estate purchase.

“According to the analysis of acquisitions in accordance with the banking movement of Ivan Lacio Amarent, it is not recognized that the Zinko Safira Incorporas LTDA Company is not recognized, which, most, through such assets, through such assets, through such assets, through such assets, without such assets.

The Magistrate Bank broke the privacy and also attracted the attention of the researchers. The Federal Police have concluded that at least R $ 1,092,350.00 has entered the Amarent account “without clear inspiration.

For researchers, the breakdown of the activities is “the obvious intention of transferring and hiding to the magistrate of large third party values”.

The cost of cost on the magistrate’s credit card has also caused doubts. According to researchers, there has been a “sudden increase in their utility model” since 2023, with the acquaintance with lawyer Roberto Jampiri. Most of the messages that had been exchanged between the judge and the lawyer took place that year.

Making “very valuable items” on behalf of the Magistrate, R $ 225 thousand and R $ 95 thousand weapons in jewelery.

“In the year 2023, Magistrate Ivan Lasio’s user profile was changed significantly, and many messages that had been exchanged between him and Roberto Jampiri were identified,” said National Justice Minister Mauro Campbell.

For the minister, “Despite the cost of the observed cost and the income of Ivan Amarent officially received, it is great to expand the cost in 2023, indicating a sudden increase in its utility process.”

The costs of the magistrate of Vila Rica, the bank and the financial privacy violation, have been a violation of the previous four years from a fixed average R $ 27,167.53, rising to R $ 159,433.95 in 2023, almost six times.

Regular

In his early defense to the National Council of Justice, the magistrate claimed that there was “error” about his income and argued that the transfers from his current wife and former nomads were regular.

The judge also denied Jampiri’s intervention in his decisions and that there was no evidence that he had bribed. He claimed that the direct economic movement was not recognized with the lawyer.