The Spanish Football Federation (RFEFHe defended transparency in choosing places for the 2030 World Cup, yet Destroyed detection the world Which influenced Maria Tatto. The Basque guidance, which participates in the nomination, made his position available to RFEF and finally stopped.
In an interview in Bodly From Ser series, Tato denied after the shooting He stressed that his exit responds to the pressure of the media. “I was not speaking on behalf of anything, and I have always maintained a low drop. What I found is something processed or unfair,” I explained. He added that the people close to the World Cup environment know their work and that their departure was distinguished by a general exhibition that he did not search for or deal with it directly.
Although RFEF talks about a stop, Tato says that his departure was voluntarily: “I do not want to continue this focus or be a goal. It took it. A political dimension and better to separate myself“According to her, the selection process was used as a political and media weapon, and its name has participated in the controversy in an unfair way. He stressed that many people cling to their locations so that the situation is not sustainable, but in his case the virtue of retirement before reaching this point.
Controversy around Figo as a headquarters
Tato justifies the exclusion of Vigo as the World Cup headquarters, ensuring that it was a technical amendment within the selection criteria. “A mistake in the initial result has been corrected. There is no manipulationHe explained. According to his copy, in the first eraser of the evaluation, the stadiums were unjustified that they were already ready to house an event of this size, such as Anuita and the Espanyol Stadium.
After reviewing the standards, the result was set, which led to the exclusion of Vigo. Tato insisted that this decision is not final and that it is in the end that determines the World Cup headquarters.
Records and manipulation
To nominate a registration against him, Description of the verb as “shameful” He emphasized after taking legal measures. “It is unacceptable to deal with someone with a voice with the aim of damaging.” Tato expressed that these types of practices are part of the environment in which they participated, and considered that the publication of audio was edited contributed to the pressure that ended with his departure. According to her, in addition to her role in choosing the main headquarters, what happened responds to the strategy of distorting an interested reputation that does not want to continue to participate.
Editing after leaving
“It was difficult days, and the reading inability is wrong information every night,” He explained that the fact that she was exposed to the speculation of the media was very frustrated, especially seeing how his statements were represented. “You feel the crime of very unfair truth”He said. Finally, he said that he now feels that he is telling his novel and documenting events as happened.
His departure adds to other crises in RFF, leaving questions about the stability of the body and the future of its administration.
