Virginia Phonseca and bet CPI: Understand the call of influencer as 5 points | Method
Parliamentary inquiry commission that investigates Online betting servicesA. CPI Das betListen to Influenancer Virginia Phonseca This Tuesday, 13. She called Senate College Witness.
The call was made by the Senator Soraya Tronic (Somos-MS), the reporter of the CPI. According to Soraya, the The existence of Virginia is important, as her main responsibility for the spread of online betting companies on the Internet.. Social Networks has more than 100 million followers on Instagram, Tictoc and YouTube.
Why was Virginia called?
According to the CPI summons in the Senate, which was approved in November last year, Virginia was called as a witness, because she was involved in the marketing campaign for bookmakers. “
Soraya Tronike believes that from the Virginia trial, it is possible to investigate moral differences in the statements of betting houses and discuss the need for new regulations in this field. The application was approved last year, but this is the first time the IFLENCER is on the hearing commission agenda.
“In recent years, the influencer has participated in marketing campaigns for bookmakers, using their wide followers to promote these activities. Depending on the effectiveness of their communication on consumer behavior, it is necessary to understand the range and moral responsibilities associated with such actions, especially in a substitute for potential social implications such as online bet.
Should Virginia be attending CPI?
According to the former community of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the Federal Supreme Court (STF), it is the duty of the people who convened as witnesses of the Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry Committee. She arrived at the Senate with her husband and singer J Felipa.
The Right to Silence, the right to help the lawyer throughout the law, the right to tell the truth, or to attain membership to the regulations with this content, and the right to submit to the right to suffer from the physical or moral trouble arising from the exercise of the previous rights, the right to help the lawyer to guarantee the right to help the law, and to guarantee the right to help the lawyer through the law.
Can the influenancer be silent?
On Monday, 12, Minister Gilmar Mendis analyzed the request and authorized Virginia Fonseca to be silent during her evidence at the CPI of Bets.
The decision stated that “the right to silence, ensures that it does not produce evidence against itself, involves the stone of the personal rights protection system and exercises one of the manifestations of the principle of human dignity.”
In addition to being silent, a lawyer helps through the statement of the influencer and “should be asked with respect”, especially the threats from prison or actions, especially if he uses the rights.
Other questions that have been investigated
The minister also highlighted the decision that the influencer could not remain silent if the CPI questioned what he knew about the issues related to other investigations and respondents.
“On the other hand, the patient has no right to silence in relation to other investigating questions, so he has the responsibility to say everything he knows,” Gilmar said in this decision.
Who was called by the CPI?
Advocate and influential Adelia Sorres, lawyer and influence Diola also represented Bezerra, forcing the bet to witness to the CPI. Adelia was called to testify on April 29, but not attended. The Federal Court of Sao Paulo gave power at the Commission’s request for the driving.
Diolan was heard by the CPI, but the Supreme Court’s Andre Mendona Minister had prevented the inquiry.
Businessman Daniel Pardim Tawares and Tawares were also known as a witness and arrested on April 29 on charges of false evidence. He refused to explain the participation of Peach Blossom River Technology in the company.
The CPI claimed that his defense and silence was not respected by lawyer Lucas Montero Faria and the CPI did not respect Pardim’s witness situation. The legal representative episode was classified as abuse of authority.
The case was used by Virginia Phonseca’s protection to support the Hebias Corpus filed in the STF.
