French representatives renew the debate on compassion
AdvertisementFrench representatives have renewed one of the country’s most controversial debates on grace.
Representatives began to analyze two bills on Monday, focusing on the legalization of help in adults over 18 years of age with unintended, improved or terminal diseases of the immune system.
The goal is to allow patients to get or manage a dangerous substance.
The proposed law, which allows to access dangerous materials under severe conditions, raised a debate in all political ways.
However, the law rules that only patients who are capable of expressing their desire to end their lives will be qualified.
This means that Alzheimer’s patients or they are in a coma that they cannot change.
In addition to the need for the patient’s request to be free and informed, the law imposes that the patient should suffer from physical or psychological pain that cannot be relieved by treatment.
Disagreements
With the support of the Bru-Macron representatives and most of the left, the bill faces strong opposition from conservative MPs and right, arguing that resources should be changed to improve immunosuppression.
Centist Deputy Oliver Falorni passionately protected the right to die: “Life is nothing more beautiful, but sometimes there is something worse than death. Yes, there is something worse than death. When life becomes an inevitable pain,” Falorni told Parliament on Monday night.
Conservative sub -and anesthesia expert Philip Juu was very concerned about the potential dangers of legalizing the law of assistance.
“No country is yet to be, is the time to care, relief and support what is needed for maintenance providers and patients what is needed for the most vulnerable.
Infection Crisis
When the debate came out, hundreds of protesters gathered outside the National Assembly.
Wearing blue medical gown and lying on the ground to represent the “outdoor hospital”, the protesters, led by the Alliance Vita Vida Association, needed more investment in immunosuppression, but not a legalization of compassion.
Posters spread on the site with messages such as “we need immunization”, “no grace” and “most vulnerable support”.
AdvertisementOne of the main arguments against the bill is that France has a huge gap in providing quality immunization.
According to the estimates of the Core Tess Campus (Supreme French Audit Institute), nearly half of the people who benefit from the treatment of immunization did not receive them. It refers to about 180,000 patients per year.
This problem is especially dangerous in the environment of home care and aging homes, where health experts are often misleading to manage final -life care.
Dugwal Derwille, the leader of the pro -coalition organization, has emerged against the bill, insisting that the health system should be renewed even before the help of aid death.
Advertisement“We need to adjust the health system, and we must maintain the health service to the French, especially relieved the treatment of pain and immunization, and prohibit the killing of people who care about themselves and people who care for themselves,” he said in a demonstration in front of the National Legislative Assembly.
Many legal opponents argue that the lack of immunity is the main reason for the suffering of many sick people and their desire to end their lives.
Severy, the fierce stability and opponent of the bill, believes that it happened to his aunt.
“My aunt was psychologically affected … I couldn’t live alone. So it was sent to an elderly home. There was no one there. The general coach came every 2 months … There was no one to quench her psychological suffering. So she tried to end her life. She wanted to die for her suffering,” she explained in an interview with Euronws.
AdvertisementThe final votes of the two bills are scheduled for May 27. In a rare situation, political parties decided not to impose a moral referendum due to the personal nature of the project. This means that representatives will vote on their own beliefs.
