The chamber accepts a request to disable criminal actions against the branch
The House of Representatives passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday (7) by a margin of 143 votes, with the Supreme Court (STF) defendant suspended a request to suspend criminal action against the defendant Alexandre Ramagam (PL-RJ).
Earlier, the Constitution and Committee . In addition, the gaspar proposes a resolution project, which opens a violation to violate all the actions in the Supreme, which benefits other defendants.
In the plenary, there was no debate among vote assistants. There is no space for amendments (indications for changes in text).
House President, Hugo Mota (Republicans-PB), explained that the Housewood regulations for this type of application were not mentioned in the plenary. Therefore, the ritual defined by the Presidency Veto negotiations, the voting postponement and the withdrawal of the agenda request.
For the ruling assistants, the proposal aims to block the ruling in the constitution and the Supreme Court. The group argued that the chamber’s capacity would only cover the members of Parliament. In addition to the branches, they are former ministers, military and the Former President Jair Bolsonoro (PL).
The ritual defined by Mota was criticized by deputating from the ruling base, he requested the revision of the process. The president of the House rejected the requests.
“I pray for the president of the establishment of this order. This order is to accept the criminal action for a member of the Parliament, and not as the deputy Alfredo Gasper’s report that allows all the accused in this criminal action. This is not acceptable, violating the constitution,” said Deputy Orlando Silva (PCDO).
Suspension of charges
Oh Request for suspension of action The punishment was submitted by the PL and it was based on the 53rd article of the Constitution. The criterion defines that “all the helpers and Senators are not violated, civil and criminal,” their views, words and votes. “
A summary from the article, when a complaint against parliament after the Diploma, the Supreme Court will know about the Congress and in the Political Party initiative, Plenary may have progress.
“The Federal Supreme Court has complained about the crime after the Diploma, and the Federal Supreme Court is in the Supreme Court, which is in which the political party represented in it and by the vote of its majority members, until the final decision, is in the constitution.” “
The Constitution provides for the request to analyze the home plenary within 45 days. If the appeal is approved by at least 257 assistants, the criminal action will be discontinued, the defendant has a command. If the deputy is not re -elected or loses his command, the process will run again.
Despite the CCJ’s decision, the STF ruled that the process could not be completely canceled against the branch. The decision of the House could reach only two of the five allegations against the members of Parliament, and the investigating crimes that occurred after the diploma – as established by the Constitution to suspend criminal action.
The defendant at the trial
Former Director of Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin) in the previous government, one of the defendants of Ramagem The process of rebellious effort State after the 2022 election. He was nominated as one of the Attorney General Office (PGR) Plot’s “key core” members.
There are allegations that Ramagame has been accused of five crimes, but only two of them have been a diploma deputy: qualified damage against violence or union assets, causing great damage, and declining the manipulation assets.
Other allegations (rebel D’TAT, criminal organization and violently abolishing the Democratic regime) are crimes before the diploma.
