An American Houthi Understanding .. This is for Washington …
In a significant change in the regional scene, the undeclared understanding between the United States and the Yemen Houthi Group has expressed the aspects of a new American approach to the crisis in Yemen, focusing on the freedom of the Red Sea.
This understanding carried out by Omani surprised some of the Washington allies led by the state of the Xionist occupation, which reflects the onset of a significant gap between the two sides between the two sides in relation to the Yemeni file.
Experts believe that the deal does not mark Washington as a strategic threat as a strategic threat, but rather reflects its awareness of the problems of military intervention in geographical and the most difficult geological environment, such as the experience of Afghanistan.
The agreement shows an attempt to reduce the politics and material cost of American involvement in an open conflict with a group of ideological and regional purposes, and it does not represent a traditional company.
On the other hand, Houthi considers this understanding to improve the situation of negotiation and to alleviate the weight of air strikes on Yemen, without this, without supporting the Palestinian cause or stopping their actions against Israel.
When this balance between peaceful and expansion, Washington continues its support for Tel Aviv in a special accurate situation, the tension can be retrieved in the forefront of the tension if the Houthis realize that the deal is only used to control without real income.
Change in the US strategy
Therefore, Dr. Khalid Shanigat, president of the Jordanian Political Science Association, said that the latest understanding between the United States and the OTH The Group was a logical step from the US view, explaining that Washington was not trying to enter a direct confrontation with Yemen from the beginning, but it was attracted to the passage of the US shops in the Red Sea.
Shenigat pointed out that the United States was not a strategic gain in military involvement in Yemen, considering the country’s rude geographical nature and its complex population system, which is very similar to the context of Afghanistan, making direct intervention into improper option.
He explained that Washington is only trying to open negotiation channels that lead to the attack of the “Ansar Allah” group on its ships.
The element of surprise to Zionist is that it does not know it, or there are no Israeli ships, which refers to a gap between Washington and Tel Aviv, which is the first time with this level of clarity.
H. OUTH The targets and approaches
As for the OTH The Group, Shenigat explained that its goal was not a confrontation with the United States, but that the expansion was in favor of Washington’s intervention or that was a reaction to the attacks on Yemen.
As part of the US -led coalition in the name of “Prosperity Guard Alliance”, the last stage of the direct goal of the Houthi’s Houthi’s Houthi’s Houthi.
Shenigat stressed that the Houthis continued to block Israeli ships despite the understanding with Washington, and that the group at this stage, the group considers their attention to the end of the war in Gaza.
In the future of the contract, he saw that the commitment to the conditions of the two sides would lead to its continuity, and as long as the United States did not trigger Houthis, instead, “Ansar Allah” does not directly target American interests and warn that it is alerting the possibility of supporting its attack, and the possibility of recovery.
He concluded that the Houthi group did not show hostility to China, Russia or other parts of the world, excluding those who participated in the military alliance against Yemen, especially the US and the UK.
Washington’s practical purposes
Regarding this agreement, Dr. Badr al -Meddy, a professor of political science at the University of German Jordanian University, thought that it reflects a temporary fight, which may be free from the tension associated with the activities associated with the Washington and London Red Sea, which does not indicate the end of the threat of the group.
The past pointed out that the US is fully aware that the Houudders are not a existential strategy, but they impose a moral and security reality that requires continuous military operations, especially on the safety of the Red Sea, which uses large resources and efforts from the United States and the UK.
Surprisingly, Zionist was not aware of the agreement, but it continues to directly target the Houthis, which is driven by its threat after attacks on the Ben Kurien airport.
He said that in an environment like its strategy towards Hamas, in order to undermine the capabilities of the Houthi, the occupation of the occupation would continue its strikes by trying to get rid of the risk from its roots.
Iranian stock at least
One of the main differences between the US and Israel has dealt with with Houthi is that the group does not represent a country with integrated political institutions, but rather a theoretical group that moves into internal and regional accounts linked to Iran.
He described the deal – in a wider environment – the additional decline of Iran’s influence in the region, in addition to its continuous losses in Syria and Lebanon.
Therefore, he believes that this agreement may be calculated as part of a series of Iranian setbacks, especially if the role of the Houthi has fallen into military and politically.
As for the humanitarian situation, the Houthis may have found the opportunity to alleviate the suffering of Yemen, in the light of the waves of the strikes they have expressed.
But he warned that the success of the deal to prevent the Israeli attacks, and insisted that the occupied government did not want to stop responding to any of the OTH threatening.
Omani medium and Israeli surprise
In turn, political analyst and strategist Nidal Abu Zaid said that the indirect understanding between the United States and the Houthi Group came with Omani mediation, and it is believed that this is one of the main reasons for postponing the fourth round nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington last Saturday.
Washington said Abu Zaid pointed out that he was interested in Omani Media and US Special Ambassador Tim Linding due to postponing the tour and he was holding indirect talks with Houthi.
He stressed that the path of negotiations with the Houthis is associated with the progress of the Iranian nuclear file and is likely to be an unannounced bartender: keep the Houthi in red in exchange for US flexibility in other regional files.
He said the link was clear as the date of the new nuclear negotiations was close.
Businessman’s mood
But on the other hand, Abu Zaid pointed out that the Houthis did not promise to prevent attacks against Zionist, and recently refers to the Israeli government that has not stopped operations towards the occupied state with evidence of an attack on Israeli soil.
Through this personal understanding of the US, Houthis, he thought that he sought to devote himself from Israeli expansion policies, and the administration of President Benjamin Netanyahu was trying to pull Washington into its interest, especially against the cost of the United States, especially against US expenditures. Group skills.
Abu Zaid added that this approach reflects the “businessman’s mindset” that runs the US policy at the current stage, as indicating the attitude of the Bidan administration, which has become close to the possibility and cost of accounting as President Trump has promoted.
Referring to the contract between Washington and the Houthis, he concluded his speech, especially if he made concessions relaxing its support to the Iranian US target, at the same time he warned that the occupation status could create a new equality when facing an increase in Houth.
