Prohibition of appointments, searched for answers from the center in 7 days … The Supreme Court of the Waqf law was asked to respond to the Supreme Court of the Waqf Act to respond in the seven days of prohibition.

This question is being carried out in the minds of 140 crore people on the Waqf law on what the Supreme Court of Waqf Act (April 17) on the Waqf Act (April 17), because both sides reached the Supreme Court against the Waqf law calls the order. From the Supreme Court to the Central Government, this is the reason why the Waqf Board is confused about the entry of non -Muslims and the ‘Waqf user’, which is because of the 7 -day ban. The Supreme Court understands every action relating to the Waqf law.

On April 16, the Central Government appealed to the Supreme Court that their arguments should be investigated before the order was issued. The court did not fulfill the order of the central government, asking for the appeal of the central government. During the hearing on April 17, the hearing on the issues of controversy before the Waqf Act was reiterated. Tried to respond a weekly security. The Supreme Court again extended the date of the order, but the Waqf board banned the entry of non -Muslims on the Waqf board and no change in the ‘Waqf’ assets by ‘user’ assets until the center responds. That is, the center was given a chance to respond to the Center, but before the order of the petitioners, the fear of Waqf law showed the way to remove it.

The Central Government states the amendments to the Waqf Act, but before the trial, Union Minister Green Rijiju said that I hope the Supreme Court will not intervene in the legislative case. We need to respect each other. If the government intervene in the judiciary tomorrow, it will not be good. The sharing of powers is well defined. Jagdhambika Paul, who was the head of the JBC on Waqf, issued a major announcement on the Waqf law before the interim order of the Supreme Hearing. He said that if a mistake was made in the law, he would resign from his post.

The attitude of the Supreme Court is very clear about the constitution and the question of Waqf law. If the constitution of a law from Parliament is investigated, the law will be tightened based on the test of the constitution. It is also from the law of powers obtained from the Constitution.

ECC’s position on 2 changes of Waqf Act is strict

The Supreme Court does not retain the Waqf law. On the contrary, the Supreme Court has agreed that Waqf’s new law has many benefits, but the Supreme Court’s position on the 2 changes of the Waqf Act is very strict. The first is to remove the ‘Waqf’ by the user, the second on the entry of non -Muslims on the Waqf board. Of these 2 issues now, the Supreme Court will come to a separate order on May 5.

What happened in the Supreme Court?

What happened in the Supreme Court on Thursday? Understand this. Solicitor General Tusher Mehta started the debate and said that we worked for the question you asked last night, but the problem was not. When you look at a part, it must be decided, and for this, the whole law and history should be seen. The law has been passed by many recommendations. The order of the Supreme Court has a huge impact. If an order is to be passed, give us a week of time, and the Supreme Court has said that there is a situation in front of us, and we do not want any situation that will affect us. We want to not be affected on the other side. In response, Tushar Mehta said, “If you want to say something about Waqf by the user, ask our side.” There will be no meeting in a week.

‘Center must file the responses within 7 days’

Commenting on this, the Supreme Court told Tushar Mehta that we do not want the situation to change and you have to give the government a new appointment. According to the amended law, the Solicitor General replied that nothing would change in a week, and I would say this. After this, the Supreme Court has stated a lot about the Waqf law that the central government should file its response within 7 days. The government has assured the court that no appointment will be made on the council and board under sections 9 and 14. Waqf will not be canceled until the next hearing by the already registered or announcement.

What will happen on May 5?

Now on May 5, the Waqf law will be heard in the Supreme Court and understand what will happen on May 5 … The Central Government will respond before the Supreme Court. The petitioners will respond to the center’s response. The arguments of both sides are in court. If the court is satisfied with the center’s response, he will not stop. If not satisfied, the place remains intact until the end of 2 problems. Everyone’s eyes are in the Supreme Court on May 5. On May 5, a decision will be taken in the Supreme Court on the full case.

Only 5 petitions will be heard

The Supreme Court has decided that only 5 of the 125 petitions will be heard. The petitioners must choose the 5 application, including all the problems of the opposition. Only 5 petitions take less time to judge the Waqf law.

5 lawyers and 5 lawyers will argue in opposition

The court has decided that 5 lawyers will argue about Waqf law and 5 lawyers in the opposition. The names of 5 lawyers are determined by the Muslim side- 1. Kapil Sibal, 2. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, 3. Rajiv Dhawan, 4. Salman Khurshid, 5. Hujifa Ahmadi. Ezaz Maghpool, Nodal Lawyer of petitioners who challenge the Waqf Act.

At the same time, there will be a group of 5 lawyers from the petitioners who support the law. It has possible lawyers- 1. Rakesh Dwivedi, 2. Maninder Singh, 3. Ranjith Kumar, 4. Ravindra Srivastava, 5. Gopal Shankar Narayan. Vishnu Shankar can handle the responsibility of the Jain Nodal Advisor. The Supreme Court will listen to both parties and opposition parties of the Waqf law. Once the trial is over, the final decision on the Waqf law will be taken. That is, a long fight on Waqf law is going to continue.